Trial reportJournal of global health2023
Efficacy of personalised text message intervention in reducing smoking frequency and amount for non-abstinent smokers: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- WeChat-based Messaging and Behavioral Counseling for Smoking Cessation for People with HIV in China: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2025Trial
- The HeartHealth Program: A Mixed Methods Study of a Community-Based Text Messaging Support Program for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease From 2020 to 2024.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emerging evidence supports the efficacy of mobile phone interventions for smoking cessation. However, behaviour changes of smokers who fail to reach abstinence and the related psychological mechanism are still understudied. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a behaviour change theory-based smoking cessation intervention delivered through personalised text messages from the perspective of smokers who fail to reach abstinence. Methods: We conducted a two-arm, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, with the intervention group receiving personalised text messages developed specifically for this study, and the control group receiving non-personalised ones related to smoking cessation. These messages were sent over a period of three months. We looked at three outcomes: changes in smoking frequency, in smoking amount, and in protection motivation theory (PMT) construct scores. Results: We obtained smoking cessation results for 722 participants who went through the randomisation process (intervention: 360, control: 362; block randomisation design). Overall, 32.3% of baseline daily smokers in the intervention group and 20.0% in the control group changed to weekly smokers during the follow-up period (P < 0.001), while 43.4% of consistent daily smokers in the intervention group and 32.8% in the control group continuously reduced their smoking amount (P < 0.001). We observed associations between the intrinsic rewards of smoking and changes from daily to weekly smoking, the perceived severity of smoking and reductions in smoking amount, as well as the self-efficacy of quitting and changes from daily to weekly smoking/reductions in smoking amount. Conclusions: We found that a personalised text message-based intervention was more likely to decrease the frequency and amount of smoking in smokers who failed to reach abstinence compared to a non-personalised one. We also explored the possible psychological mechanism of such positive effects. Here we provide evidence for countries to consider the promotion of smoking cessations using behaviour theory-driven personalised text messages, which may be more cost-effective than traditional approaches. Registration: Peking University: ChiCTR2100041942.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.