Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883164›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2023

Temporal Generalizability of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Postoperative Delirium Using Electronic Health Record Data: Model Development and Validation Study.

Koutarou Matsumoto, Yasunobu Nohara, Mikako Sakaguchi, Yohei Takayama, Syota Fukushige, Hidehisa Soejima, Naoki Nakashima, Masahiro Kamouchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koutarou MatsumotoBiostatistics Center, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-7763
Yasunobu NoharaBig Data Science and Technology, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-6597
Mikako SakaguchiDepartment of Nursing, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9909-0945
Yohei TakayamaDepartment of Nursing, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0905-1997
Syota FukushigeDepartment of Inspection, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2086-9079
Hidehisa SoejimaInstitute for Medical Information Research and Analysis, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-7481
Naoki NakashimaMedical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-8772
Masahiro KamouchiDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-8762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough machine learning models demonstrate significant potential in predicting postoperative delirium, the advantages of their implementation in real-world settings remain unclear and require a comparison with conventional models in practical applications.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to validate the temporal generalizability of decision tree ensemble and sparse linear regression models for predicting delirium after surgery compared with that of the traditional logistic regression model.

methodsThe health record data of patients hospitalized at an advanced emergency and critical care medical center in Kumamoto, Japan, were collected electronically. We developed a decision tree ensemble model using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a sparse linear regression model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. To evaluate the predictive performance of the model, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) to measure discrimination and the slope and intercept of the regression between predicted and observed probabilities to measure calibration. The Brier score was evaluated as an overall performance metric. We included 11,863 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with general anesthesia between December 2017 and February 2022. The patients were divided into a derivation cohort before the COVID-19 pandemic and a validation cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Postoperative delirium was diagnosed according to the confusion assessment method.

resultsA total of 6497 patients (68.5, SD 14.4 years, women n=2627, 40.4%) were included in the derivation cohort, and 5366 patients (67.8, SD 14.6 years, women n=2105, 39.2%) were included in the validation cohort. Regarding discrimination, the XGBoost model (AUROC 0.87-0.90 and MCC 0.34-0.44) did not significantly outperform the LASSO model (AUROC 0.86-0.89 and MCC 0.34-0.41). The logistic regression model (AUROC 0.84-0.88, MCC 0.33-0.40, slope 1.01-1.19, intercept -0.16 to 0.06, and Brier score 0.06-0.07), with 8 predictors (age, intensive care unit, neurosurgery, emergency admission, anesthesia time, BMI, blood loss during surgery, and use of an ambulance) achieved good predictive performance.

conclusionsThe XGBoost model did not significantly outperform the LASSO model in predicting postoperative delirium. Furthermore, a parsimonious logistic model with a few important predictors achieved comparable performance to machine learning models in predicting postoperative delirium.

Indexed as

electronic health record datamachine learningpostoperative deliriumprediction modeltemporal generalizability

Identifiers

PMID37883164
PMCPMC10636625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.