ArticleJAMA network open2023
Eligibility for Human Leukocyte Antigen-Based Therapeutics by Race and Ethnicity.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Tolerability of Letetresgene Autoleucel (GSK3377794): Pilot Studies in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Tebentafusp (IMCgp100), a first in class immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors against cancer (ImmTAC) for HLA-A*02:01 positive uveal melanoma: Product review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- The evolution of cellular therapies in sarcoma: Breakthroughs, challenges, and future directions.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Disparities in Patients with Choroidal Melanoma between Black and Hispanic versus Non-Hispanic White Patients.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- RAB1A is a novel vulnerability in uveal melanoma revealed by dual inhibition of MNK1/2 and mTOR.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- From Universal Aspiration to Precision Immunization: A Hypothesis Framework for Antigen-Defined, HLA-Restricted Cancer Vaccines.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Sequence-Anchored Shared Tumor-Specific Epitopes for Pre-Manufactured HLA-Matched mRNA Cancer Vaccine Libraries: A Pan-Cancer Framework.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Advances in cancer immunotherapy: adoptive cell therapy and immune cell engagers in solid tumours.British journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Large-Scale Assessment ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cancer type-specific variation in patterns of driver alterations across 50,000 tumors.Cancer cell · 2026Article
- Disparities in breast cancer incidence and survival by age, race, and molecular subtype in US women.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- T cells engineered against Dickkopf-1-A2 complex can be used to treat HLA-A2Nature communications · 2026Article
- Recipient Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Homozygosity and Access to Quality Kidneys.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Survival in Uveal Melanoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).Cancers · 2026Article
- After a Decade of Therapy Revolution in Cutaneous Melanoma-Perspectives on Emerging Treatment Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- HLA class I-specific nucleolin peptides induce therapeutic T cells in triple-negative breast cancer patients.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of race/ethnicity and the presence of immune-related adverse events on outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- HLA incompatibility mitigation strategies in off-the-shelf cancer immunotherapies: clinical implications and a practical framework for strategy selection and combination.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Targeting solid tumors with TCR-T cells: mechanisms, progress, and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for high grade gliomas: current and future directions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The development of therapeutics for patients who are positive for specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) subtypes evokes the question of whether certain racial and ethnic groups are more or less likely to be eligible for novel products. Objective: To determine whether racial and ethnic inequities were present with regard to trial eligibility in trials investigating a therapeutic restricted to patients with specific HLA subtypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov through March 18, 2022, that investigated an interventional study of a therapeutic strategy and restricted participants to those with at least 1 HLA subtype. Data were analyzed from May 8 to July 1, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The type of therapeutics used in trials, the condition under study, the HLA subtypes used, and the likelihood of being enrolled in such a trial according to race and ethnicity. Results: Of 2135 trials identified, 263 met inclusion criteria. Overall, the estimated likelihood of being eligible for an HLA-based trial was 50.3%. Individuals of African American descent had the lowest likelihood of eligibility (33.0%), while being an individual of European descent conferred the highest (53.0%; 1.6 times more likely than African American individuals). Most trials studied anticancer therapeutics (258 [98.1%; 95% CI, 96.4%-99.7%]), and most were a therapeutic vaccine (179 [68.1%; 95% CI, 62.4%-73.7%]). The HLA-A*02:01 allele and the HLA-A2 serotype were the most frequent HLA subtypes for trial eligibility. The frequency of the HLA-A*02:01 allele in the population varied, with 11.9% (95% CI, 11.8%-12.0%) in African or African American individuals and 27.1% (95% CI, 27.1%-27.1%) in individuals of European descent. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that enrollment restrictions for clinical trials investigating novel HLA therapeutics may be associated with racial and ethnic inequities with regard to trial eligibility. Overcoming these restrictions poses biological challenges, but solutions must be implemented to provide equal access to innovative strategies regardless of race or ethnicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.