Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882997›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Theta-burst stimulation as a therapeutic tool in neurological pathology: a systematic review.

Nicoleta Jemna, Ana Calina Zdrenghea, Georgiana Frunza, Anca Diana Demea, Gheorghe Elian Hapca, Diana Alecsandra Grad, Ioana Anamaria Muresanu, Razvan Mircea Chereches, Fior Dafin Muresanu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of Accelerated Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Hand Dystonia: From Acute Phase to Maintenance Treatment.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicoleta JemnaRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Ana Calina ZdrengheaRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania. ana.calina.beldean@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1129-2557
Georgiana FrunzaRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Anca Diana DemeaRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Gheorghe Elian HapcaRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Diana Alecsandra GradRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Ioana Anamaria MuresanuRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Razvan Mircea CherechesRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Fior Dafin MuresanuRoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TBS (theta-burst stimulation) is a novel therapeutic approach in a wide range of neurological diseases. The present systematic review aims to identify the various protocols used in the last years, to assess study quality and to offer a general overview of the current state of the literature. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We applied the following inclusion criteria: (1) population over 18 years old with diagnosed neurological disorders, (2) patients treated with sessions of theta-burst stimulation, (3) randomized-controlled clinical trials, (4) articles in the English language, and (5) studies that report response and score reduction on a validated scale of the investigated disorder or remission rates. We included in the final analysis 56 randomized controlled trials focusing on different neurological pathologies (stroke, Parkinson`s disease, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, dystonia, chronic pain, essential tremor and tic disorder), and we extracted data regarding study design, groups and comparators, sample sizes, type of coil, stimulation parameters (frequency, number of pulses, intensity, stimulation site etc.), number of sessions, follow-up, assessment through functional connectivity and neurological scales used. We observed a great interstudy heterogenicity that leads to a difficulty in drawing plain conclusions. TBS protocols have shown promising results in improving various symptoms in patients with neurological disorders, but larger and more coherent studies, using similar stimulation protocols and evaluation scales, are needed to establish guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicInterstudy heterogenicityNeurological pathologiesStimulation protocolsTheta-burst stimulation (TBS)Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.