Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882896›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023

Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of small vs. large aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdul Karim Ghaith, Elena Greco, Jorge Rios-Zermeno, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Carlos Perez-Vega, Marc Ghanem, Samir Kashyap, W Christopher Fox, Thien J Huynh, Sukhwinder S Sandhu and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Outcomes after flow diversion for ruptured blood blister-like and dissecting aneurysms: A single-center series.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdul Karim GhaithMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elena GrecoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Jorge Rios-ZermenoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Victor Gabriel El-HajjMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carlos Perez-VegaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Marc GhanemMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Samir KashyapDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
W Christopher FoxDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Thien J HuynhDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Sukhwinder S SandhuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Marcus OhlssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bernard R BendokDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Mohamad BydonMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rabih G TawkDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Tawk.Rabih@mayo.edu.
Neurological Surgery · USWinnMed · USKarolinska Institutet · SEMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms with high obliteration rates and low morbidity. However, long-term (≥ 1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes still require further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion and complication rates for small (< 10 mm) versus large (10-25 mm) aneurysms at long-term following treatment with PED. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a comprehensive search of English language databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our studies included a minimum of 10 patients treated with PED for small vs. large aneurysms and with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of clinical complications measured by the occurrence of symptomatic stroke (confirmed clinically and radiographically), intracranial hemorrhage, or aneurysmal rupture. The primary efficacy endpoint was the complete aneurysm occlusion rate. Our analysis included 19 studies with 1277 patients and 1493 aneurysms. Of those, 1378 aneurysms met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.9 years, and most aneurysms were small (89.75%; N = 1340) in women (79.1%; N = 1010). The long-term occlusion rate was 73% (95%, CI 65 to 80%) in small compared to 84% (95%, CI 76 to 90%) in large aneurysms (p < 0.01). The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was 5% (95%, CI 3 to 9%) in small compared to 7% (95%, CI 4 to 13%) in large aneurysms (p = 0.01). The rupture rate was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.92), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.96) for small vs. large aneurysms, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The long-term occlusion rate after PED treatment is higher in large vs. small aneurysms. Symptomatic thromboembolic rates with stroke are also higher in large vs. small aneurysms. The difference in the rates of aneurysm rupture and intracranial hemorrhage was insignificant. Although the PED seems a safe and effective treatment for small and large aneurysms, further studies are required to clarify how occlusion rate and morbidity are affected by aneurysm size.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmStrokeAngiographyFemaleHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesMiddle AgedIntracranial aneurysmsLarge aneurysmsPipeline embolization deviceSmall aneurysms

Identifiers

PMID37882896
OpenAlexW4387950119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.