ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Highly accelerated compressed sensing 4D flow MRI in congenital and acquired heart disease: comparison of aorta and main pulmonary artery flow parameters with conventional 4D flow MRI in children and young adults.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A second-hit conceptual framework for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adult congenital heart disease: genetics, hemodynamics, and treat-and-repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Going with the flow: Implementing a 4D flow MRI program at a children's hospital.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Hemodynamic evaluation of the pulmonary arteries and aorta using 4D flow cardiac MRI in children and young adults with dextro-transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Image reconstruction impacts haemodynamic parameters derived from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging with compressed sensing.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Observation of intracranial artery and venous sinus hemodynamics using compressed sensing-accelerated 4D flow MRI: performance at different acceleration factors.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFour-dimensional flow (4D flow) MRI has become a clinically utilized cardiovascular flow assessment tool. However, scans can be lengthy and may require anesthesia in younger children. Adding compressed sensing can decrease scan time, but its impact on hemodynamic data accuracy needs additional assessment.
objectiveTo compare 4D flow hemodynamics acquired with and without compressed sensing. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-seven patients (median age: 13 [IQR: 9.5] years) underwent conventional and compressed sensing cardiovascular 4D flow following informed consent. Conventional 4D flow was performed using parallel imaging and an acceleration factor of 2. Compressed sensing 4D flow was performed with an acceleration factor of 7.7. Regions of interest were placed to compare flow parameters in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery. Paired Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Bland-Altman plots, and intraclass correlation coefficients were conducted. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsMean scan acquisition time was reduced by 59% using compressed sensing (3.4 vs. 8.2 min, P < 0.001). Flow quantification was similar for compressed sensing and conventional 4D flow for the ascending aorta net flow: 47 vs. 49 ml/beat (P = 0.28); forward flow: 49 vs. 50 ml/beat (P = 0.07), and main pulmonary artery net flow: 49 vs. 51 ml/beat (P = 0.18); forward flow: 50 vs. 55 ml/beat (P = 0.07). Peak systolic velocity was significantly underestimated by compressed sensing 4D flow in the ascending aorta: 114 vs. 128 cm/s (P < 0.001) and main pulmonary artery: 106 vs. 112 cm/s (P = 0.02).
conclusionFor both the aorta and main pulmonary artery, compressed sensing 4D flow provided equivalent net and forward flow values compared to conventional 4D flow but underestimated peak systolic velocity. By reducing scan time, compressed sensing 4D flow may decrease the need for anesthesia and increase scanner output without significantly compromising data integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.