Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882840›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Effects of new minimum volume standards in visceral surgery on healthcare in Brandenburg, Germany, from the perspective of healthcare providers].

C M Kugler, S Gretschel, J Scharfe, S Pfisterer-Heise, R Mantke, D Pieper

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C M KuglerFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Brandenburg, Institut für Versorgungs- und Gesundheitssystemforschung (IVGF), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (Theodor Fontane), Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Deutschland. charlotte.kugler@mhb-fontane.de.
S GretschelKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ruppin-Brandenburg (ukrb), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Deutschland.
J ScharfeFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Brandenburg, Institut für Versorgungs- und Gesundheitssystemforschung (IVGF), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (Theodor Fontane), Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Deutschland.
S Pfisterer-HeiseFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Brandenburg, Institut für Versorgungs- und Gesundheitssystemforschung (IVGF), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (Theodor Fontane), Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Deutschland.
R MantkeKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (ukb), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Deutschland.
D PieperFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Brandenburg, Institut für Versorgungs- und Gesundheitssystemforschung (IVGF), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg (Theodor Fontane), Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe legally prescribed minimum volume standards for complex esophageal and pancreatic surgery have been increased or will increase in 2023 and 2025, respectively. Hospitals not reaching the minimum volume standards are no longer allowed to perform these surgeries and are not entitled tor reimbursement.

objectiveThe study aims to explore which effects are expected by healthcare professionals and patient representatives and what possible solutions exist for Brandenburg, a rural federal state in northeast Germany. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study 19 expert interviews were conducted with hospital employees (head/senior physicians, nursing director), resident physicians and patient representatives between July 2022 and January 2023. The data analysis was based on content analysis.

resultsHealthcare professionals and patient representatives expect a redistribution into a few clinics for surgical care (specialized centres); conversely more clinics that do not (no longer) perform the defined surgeries but could function as gatekeeping hospitals for basic care, diagnostics and follow-up (regional centres). The redistribution could also impact forms of treatment that are not directly defined within the regulation for minimum volume standards. The increased thresholds could also affect medical training and staff recruitment. A solution could be collaborations between different hospitals, which would have to be structurally promoted.

conclusionThe study showed that minimum volume standards not only influence the quality of outcomes and accessibility but also have a multitude of other effects. Particularly for rural regions, minimum volume standards are challenging for access to esophageal and pancreatic surgery as well as for communication between specialized and regional centres or resident providers.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresHospitalsDelivery of Health CareEsophagusHealth PersonnelHumansCentralizationEsophagusPancreasRural healthcareVolume thresholds

Identifiers

PMID37882840
PMCPMC10689523
OpenAlexW4387948879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.