Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882839›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Endoscopic negative pressure treatment : From management of complications to pre-emptive active reflux drainage in abdominothoracic esophageal resection-A new safety concept for esophageal surgery].

Gunnar Loske, Johannes Müller, Wolfgang Schulze, Burkhard Riefel, Matthias Reeh, Christian Theodor Müller

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gunnar LoskeKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Deutschland. Loske.chir@marienkrankenhaus.org.
Johannes MüllerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Wolfgang SchulzeKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Burkhard RiefelKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Matthias ReehKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Christian Theodor MüllerChirurgie, Wilhelmsburger Krankenhaus Groß-Sand, Groß-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly postoperative reflux (PR) can compromise anastomotic healing after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) and poses a risk for aspiration. Anastomotic insufficiency is the most threatening surgical complication. We present the protective method of pre-emptive active reflux drainage (PARD) with simultaneous enteral feeding. We report our experience with this new safety concept in esophageal surgery in a cohort of 43 patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor PARD we use a double lumen open porous film drainage (dOFD). To create the dOFD, the gastric tube of a Trelumina probe (Freka®Trelumina, Fresenius) is coated with a double-layered open-pore drainage film (Suprasorb®CNP drainage film, Lohmann & Rauscher) over a length of 25 cm. The dOFD is endoscopically inserted into the tubular stomach intraoperatively after completion of the anastomosis. Continuous negative pressure is applied with an electronic pump (-125 mm Hg). The PR is continuously aspirated completely and the stomach and anastomotic region are decompressed. At the same time, nutrition is delivered via an integrated intestinal tube. Depending on the results of the endoscopic control after 5 days, PARD is either continued or terminated.

resultsDuring the observation period (2017-2023), PARD was used in all patients (n = 43) with ILE. The healing rate under PARD was 100% and healing was observed in all anastomoses. No additional endoscopic procedures or surgical revisions of the anastomoses were required. The median duration of PARD was 8 days (range 4-21). We observed problems in the healing of the anastomosis in 20 of 43 patients (47%) for whom we defined endoscopic criteria for at-risk anastomosis.

conclusionsOur results suggest that PARD has a strong protective effect on anastomotic healing and may reduce the risk of anastomotic insufficiency. The integrated feeding tube of the dOFD allows early postoperative enteral feeding while simultaneously applying negative pressure. PARD appears to prevent the negative consequences of impaired anastomotic healing.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyGastroesophageal RefluxDrainageEndoscopyHumansAnastomosis insufficiencyAt-risk anastomosisIntraluminal endoscopic vacuum therapyPreventionProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37882839
PMCPMC10689535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.