Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882772›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2024

Pediatric reference intervals for serum neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein using the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) cohort.

Sophie Stukas, Jennifer Cooper, Victoria Higgins, Daniel Holmes, Khosrow Adeli, Cheryl L Wellington

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07585149 (Generating Intervals of Reference FFor Early Life Brain Biomarkers.), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07585149 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Generating Intervals of Reference FFor Early Life Brain Biomarkers.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College CorkRan2026 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsReference Intervals, Biomarker in Early Diagnosis, Neonatal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie StukasDjavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8819-8821
Jennifer CooperDjavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4703-2109
Victoria HigginsCALIPER Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel HolmesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Khosrow AdeliCALIPER Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cheryl L WellingtonDjavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBlood biomarkers have the potential to transform diagnosis and prognosis for multiple neurological indications. Establishing normative data is a critical benchmark in the analytical validation process. Normative data are important in children as little is known about how brain development may impact potential biomarkers. The objective of this study is to generate pediatric reference intervals (RIs) for serum neurofilament light (NfL), an axonal marker, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an astrocytic marker.

methodsSerum from healthy children and adolescents aged 1 to <19 years were obtained from the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) cohort. Serum NfL (n=300) and GFAP (n=316) were quantified using Simoa technology, and discrete RI (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) and continuous RI (5th and 95th percentiles) were generated.

resultsWhile there was no association with sex, there was a statistically significant (p<0.0001) negative association between age and serum NfL (Rho -0.400) and GFAP (Rho -0.749). Two statistically significant age partitions were generated for NfL: age 1 to <10 years (lower, upper limit; 3.13, 20.6 pg/mL) and 10 to <19 years (1.82, 7.44 pg/mL). For GFAP, three statistically significant age partitions were generated: age 1 to <3.5 years (80.4, 601 pg/mL); 3.5 to <11 years (50.7, 224 pg/mL); and 11 to <19 years (26.2, 119 pg/mL).

conclusionsTaken together with the literature on adults, NfL and GFAP display U-shaped curves with high levels in infants, decreasing levels during childhood, a plateau during adolescence and early adulthood and increasing levels in seniors. These normative data are expected to inform future pediatric studies on the importance of age on neurological blood biomarkers.

Indexed as

Intermediate FilamentsSerumAdolescentAdultBiomarkersChildGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansNeurofilament ProteinsPrognosisBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurofilament Proteinsblood biomarkerglial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)neurofilament light (NfL)neurologypediatricreference intervals

Identifiers

PMID37882772
PMCPMC10895925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.