Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882698›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2023

Analysis of the health advocacy concept from the perspective of the evolutionary method.

Odaleia de Oliveira Farias, Maria Gabriela Miranda Fontenele, Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima, Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão, Viviane Martins da Silva, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Odaleia de Oliveira FariasUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-1192
Maria Gabriela Miranda FonteneleUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-921X
Francisca Elisângela Teixeira LimaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-6947
Marli Teresinha Gimeniz GalvãoUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-9107
Viviane Martins da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-8831
Marcos Venícios de Oliveira LopesUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Enfermagem, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-8023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the concept of Health Advocacy from the methodological framework of the Evolutionary Model.

methodThe concept of interest was evaluated from the perspective of published studies identified in the databases: Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, MEDLINE and articles of interest. The attributes were determined from 19 scientific productions. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, proposed by Bardin.

resultsThe following operational definition was obtained: Health Advocacy is an intentional action, implemented jointly and in favor of individuals and communities, especially for those who suffer from health inequalities, with the aim of preserving and improving health, well-being and empowerment for health promotion. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: Thus, a broader concept of Health Advocacy was abstracted, from the micro to the macro, which contemplates the development of the patient's autonomy; includes individuals and groups in care plans and involves them in political activities as possibilities to provide assistance and correct health inequalities.

Indexed as

Health PromotionResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID37882698
PMCPMC10601892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.