ArticleeLife2023
Association between
Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- APOL1 kidney risk variants and outcomes in children with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Mendelian randomization-based drug repurposing pipeline: application to lipid traits and coronary artery disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Rising deaths due to sepsis and renal failure: a 22-year analysis of mortality trends in the US from 1999 to 2020.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- APOL1-mediated kidney disease: a narrative review of the lessons learnt from the past 15 years.BMC nephrology · 2025Review
- Assessing long-term pleiotropic effects of potential novel triglyceride-lowering medications using variants identified by Mendelian randomization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Two risk variants in the apolipoprotein L1 gene ( Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 2242 Black patients hospitalized with infections. We assessed whether carriage of Results: Of 2242 Black patients hospitalized with infections, 565 developed sepsis. Patients with high-risk Conclusions: Funding: This study was supported by R01GM120523 (QF), R01HL163854 (QF), R35GM131770 (CMS), HL133786 (WQW), and Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholar Fund (QF). The dataset(s) used for the analyses described were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center's BioVU which is supported by institutional funding, the 1S10RR025141-01 instrumentation award, and by the CTSA grant UL1TR0004from NCATS/NIH. Additional funding provided by the NIH through grants P50GM115305 and U19HL065962. The authors wish to acknowledge the expert technical support of the VANTAGE and VANGARD core facilities, supported in part by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA068485) and Vanderbilt Vision Center (P30 EY08126). The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.