Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882630›Full record

ReviewBJS open2023

The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review.

Derek J Roberts, Ari Leppäniemi, Matti Tolonen, Panu Mentula, Martin Björck, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Michael Sugrue, Bruno M Pereira, Ulf Petersson, Federico Coccolini and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07154589 (Effects of AbClo Fascial Approximation Device in Patients With Open Abdomen on Respiratory Mechanics), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07154589 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of AbClo Fascial Approximation Device in Patients With Open Abdomen on Respiratory Mechanics (AbClo-Resp)

TypeobservationalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsOpen Abdomen, Mechanical Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Derek J RobertsDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ari LeppäniemiAbdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Matti TolonenAbdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Panu MentulaAbdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-3797
Martin BjörckDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andrew W KirkpatrickTeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions (TMUSMI) Research Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael SugrueDepartment of Surgery Letterkenny, University Hospital Donegal, Donegal, Ireland.
Bruno M PereiraDepartment of Surgery, Masters Program in Health Applied Sciences, Vassouras University, Vassouras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ulf PeterssonDepartment of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Federico CoccoliniDepartment of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6364-4186
Rifat LatifiDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
University of Helsinki · FILetterkenny University Hospital · IELund University · SEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Vassouras · BRUppsala University · SEWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe open abdomen is an innovation that greatly improved surgical understanding of damage control, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, viscera and enteric fistula care, and abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an evidence-informed, expert, comprehensive narrative review of the open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery.

methodsA group of 12 international trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery experts were invited to review current literature and important concepts surrounding the open abdomen.

resultsThe open abdomen may be classified using validated systems developed by a working group in 2009 and modified by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome-The Abdominal Compartment Society in 2013. It may be indicated in major trauma, intra-abdominal sepsis, vascular surgical emergencies, and severe acute pancreatitis; to facilitate second look laparotomy or avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome; and when the abdominal wall cannot be safely closed. Temporary abdominal closure and staged abdominal reconstruction methods include a mesh/sheet, transabdominal wall dynamic fascial traction, negative pressure wound therapy, and hybrid negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial traction. This last method likely has the highest primary fascial closure rates. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is currently an experimental strategy developed to improve primary fascial closure rates and reduce complications in those with an open abdomen. Primary fascial closure rates may be improved by early return to the operating room; limiting use of crystalloid fluids during the surgical interval; and preventing and/or treating intra-abdominal hypertension, enteric fistulae, and intra-abdominal collections after surgery. The majority of failures of primary fascial closure and enteroatmospheric fistula formation may be prevented using effective temporary abdominal closure techniques, providing appropriate resuscitation fluids and nutritional support, and closing the abdomen as early as possible.

conclusionSubsequent stages of the innovation of the open abdomen will likely involve the design and conduct of prospective studies to evaluate appropriate indications for its use and effectiveness and safety of the above components of open abdomen management.

Indexed as

FistulaIntra-Abdominal HypertensionPancreatitisAcute DiseaseHumansPeritoneumProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37882630
PMCPMC10601091
OpenAlexW4387949183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.