Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37882320›Full record

ArticleRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2024

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and other newly approved antimicrobials against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens recovered in intensive care units in Spain and Portugal.

D Gijón, J García-Castillo, M C Fernández-López, G Bou, M Siller, J Calvo-Montes, C Pitart, J Vila, N Torno, C Gimeno and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cefiderocol treatment for patients infected by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia cepacia complex and Achromobacter spp.: subgroup analysis from the PERSEUS study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  2. Effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol treatment in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections in Spain in the early access programme: results of the PERSEUS study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. In-vitro activity of the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. clinical isolates collected in Switzerland in 2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

D Gijón *
J García-Castillo *
M C Fernández-López
G Bou
M Siller
J Calvo-Montes
C Pitart
J Vila
N Torno
C Gimeno
H Cruz
H Ramos
X Mulet
A Oliver
P Ruiz-Garbajosa
R CantonRafael Cantón. Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Carretera de Colmenar Km 9,1. 28034-Madrid. Spain. rafael.canton@salud.madrid.org.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital de Santo António · PTUniversitat de València · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe antimicrobial resistance is a significant public health threat, particularly for healthcare-associated infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens which are increasingly reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to provide data on the in vitro antimicrobial activity of cefiderocol and that of commercially available comparator antibiotics against a defined collection of recent clinical multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms, including carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from different regions in Spain and Portugal.

methodsA total of 477 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were prospectively (n=265) and retrospectively (n=212) included (2016-2019). Susceptibility testing was performed using standard broad microdilution and results were interpreted using CLSI-2021 and EUCAST-2021 criteria.

resultsOverall, cefiderocol showed a good activity against Enterobacterales isolates, being 99.5% susceptible by CLSI and 94.5% by EUCAST criteria. It also demonstrated excellent activity against P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia isolates, all being susceptible to this compound considering CLSI breakpoints. Regarding A. baumannii (n=64), only one isolate was resistant to cefiderocol.

conclusionsOur results are in agreement with other studies performed outside Spain and Portugal highlighting its excellent activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria. Cefiderocol is a therapeutic alternative to those available for the treatment of infections caused by these MDR bacteria.

Indexed as

CefiderocolCephalosporinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPortugalPseudomonas aeruginosaRetrospective StudiesSpainAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCefiderocolCephalosporinscarbapenemasecefiderocolGram-negative pathogensmultidrug resistantsiderophore cephalosporin

Identifiers

PMID37882320
PMCPMC10874671
OpenAlexW4387948709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.