ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2024
Echocardiographic function evaluation in adolescents following BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination: A preliminary prospective study.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply to: "To conclude that BNT162b2 does not worsen echocardiographic indices, well-powered multicenter studies are required".Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- To conclude that BNT162b2 does not worsen echocardiographic indices, well-powered multicenter studies are required.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is crucial for preventing and minimizing illness. Myocarditis and pericarditis after messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adult males have been reported. Most of the studies in this area rely on retrospective symptom reporting, especially for adolescents experiencing myocarditis as a potential side effect. However, prospective postvaccination echocardiographic evaluation is rare.
methodsThe study enrolled adolescents aged 12 to 15 years who received the second dose of the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA (BNT) vaccine. Serial echocardiographic examinations were conducted at baseline before vaccination, followed by subsequent assessments on days 2, 7, 14, and 28 to identify any notable differences or abnormal changes in cardiac function. Clinical symptom assessments were also recorded during each follow-up.
resultsThe study included 25 adolescents, comprising 14 males and 11 females, who completed the four follow-ups. Their mean age was 14 ± 1 years. The average interval between the first and second BNT vaccine doses was 90 ± 7 days. Ejection fraction values were 73.8% ± 5.2% at baseline, followed by 75.7% ± 5.3%, 75.5% ± 4.6%, 75.7% ± 4.5%, and 77.8% ± 5.8% at day 2, 7, 14, and 28, respectively. The cardiac function remained stable across all time points, with no significant differences observed between male and female participants. Within postvaccination 48 hours, 18 (72%) of the enrolled adolescents experienced temporary discomfort symptoms, which completely resolved by the final follow-up on the 28th day after vaccination.
conclusionAlthough adolescents vaccinated with the second dose of BNT vaccine commonly experienced transient postvaccination discomfort, the serial echocardiographic examinations did not reveal any significant deterioration of cardiac function within 28 days. Further studies are required to investigate the incidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination-associated myocarditis in adolescents and the related mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.