Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881919›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2023

Peer-reviewed visuals and auditory - isn't it time to incorporate?

Karim Soliman, Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Cheungpasitporn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karim SolimanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0960-2644
Charat ThongprayoonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA.
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A remarkable opportunity emerges amidst the dynamic evolution of medical education, one that could fundamentally alter how healthcare professionals gain and share knowledge. The concept of incorporating a structured, peer-reviewed video and audio section, as well as a dedicated submission portal, into the medical journals symbolizes a revolutionary advance. This addition has the potential to not only improve the educational experiences of the journal's audience, but also to create a more accessible forum for the exchange of knowledge and citation. In this article, we explore the compelling potential of introducing structured videos and podcasts into the domain of medical literature, as well as the promising implications for revamping medical practitioners' learning strategies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceauditoryEducationvideosvisuals

Identifiers

PMID37881919
PMCPMC11001339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.