Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881840›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2023

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on consultation-liaison activity: changes in everyday clinical practice and work-related factors associated with the psychiatrist's need for seeking help.

Giorgio Mattei, Krzysztof Krysta, Massimo Clerici, Fabrizia Colmegna, Vladimir Korostiy, Dalibor Karlović, Marek Krzystanek, Gilbert M D Lemmens, Pieter-Jan Geerts, Filipa Novais and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giorgio MatteiAssociation for Research in Psychiatry, Castelnuovo Rangone, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5326-303X
Krzysztof KrystaDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5984-3358
Massimo ClericiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizia ColmegnaConsultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Mental Health and Addiction (DSMD), ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
Vladimir KorostiyDepartment of Psychiatry, Narcology and Medical Psychology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-8256
Dalibor KarlovićDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marek KrzystanekDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1665-7344
Gilbert M D LemmensDepartment of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7532-6350
Pieter-Jan GeertsUniversity of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-2695
Filipa NovaisDepartment of Psychiatry, AZ Groeninge, Courtrai, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-1734
Vjekoslav PeitlDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-6411
Jacopo SantambrogioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7668-7564
Dan GeorgescuDepartment of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Old Age Psychiatry and Neurodevelopmental Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services Aargau, Windisch, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-4820
Diogo Telles CorreiaUniversity of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) services were in first line to face the effects of the novel virus.

aimAim of this study was to assess the activity of CLP services during the pandemic, and to identify specific work features associated with the need for psychological/psychiatric support by the CL psychiatrist during the pandemic.

methodsThis study was carried out in six European countries. A questionnaire was developed to collect information concerning psychiatric referrals for patients affected and not affected by COVID-19. Multivariate binary logistic regressions were used to study work-related factors associated with the need for psychological and/or psychiatric support by the CL psychiatrist during the pandemic.

resultsThe sample included 108 psychiatrists working in CLP services in six countries. The majority reported that the pandemic had not impacted on their work with non-COVID-19 patients. Among patients affected by COVID-19, the most common psychiatric diagnoses were anxious-depressive disorders related to COVID-19, delirium due to COVID-19, anxious-depressive disorders unrelated to COVID-19, suicidal ideation related to COVID-19. The 25% of psychiatrists reported having needed psychological or psychiatric support during the pandemic due to assisting COVID-19-positive patient. The need for support was associated with increased age, few years of medical experience and experience of anxiety while consulting COVID-19-positive patients. The risk was reduced using personal protective equipment and teleconsulting.

conclusionsFindings prompt to the need of addressing health issues of health care professionals, namely psychiatrists working in the field of CLP and psychosomatics.

Indexed as

burnoutconsultation-liaison psychiatryCOVID-19psychosomaticswork-related factors

Identifiers

PMID37881840
PMCPMC12538172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.