Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881801›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2023

[Gaps in primary mental health care in Chocó, Colombia: barriers and challengesLacunas na atenção primária à saúde mental em Chocó, Colômbia: barreiras e desafios].

Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Juan Fernando García Cano, Luz María Salazar Vieira, Wendy Vergara Palacios, Mónica Padilla, Bibian Moreno Mayorga

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of an instrument to guide the implementation of strategies for mental health care in Colombia.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe Agudelo-HernándezOrganización Panamericana de la Salud Bogotá Colombia Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Bogotá. Colombia.
Juan Fernando García CanoOrganización Panamericana de la Salud Bogotá Colombia Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Bogotá. Colombia.
Luz María Salazar VieiraOrganización Panamericana de la Salud Bogotá Colombia Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Bogotá. Colombia.
Wendy Vergara PalaciosSecretaria de Salud de Quibdó Chocó Colombia Secretaria de Salud de Quibdó, Chocó, Colombia.
Mónica PadillaOrganización Panamericana de la Salud Bogotá Colombia Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Bogotá. Colombia.
Bibian Moreno MayorgaMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social Bogotá Colombia Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ministry of Health and Social Protection · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Describe barriers and challenges in the implementation of the global Mental Health Gap Action Program (mhGAP), and determine the association between facilitators of implementation, accessibility, acceptability, and supervision, in Chocó, Colombia. Methods: Cross-sectional evaluation study, with mixed and sequential methods. Forty-one people participated: 30 health personnel and 11 administrative workers. Five focus groups were formed within the framework of the mhGAP training. The Likert scale of implementation drivers was used to determine factors affecting the strategy, such as system facilitators, accessibility of the strategy, adaptation and acceptability, and training and supervision. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted, with a subsequent thematic analysis. Results: A statistically significant correlation was found between the components of implementation. This was reaffirmed by the information from the interviews. Notable barriers include dispersion, armed conflict, difficulty in changing one's perspective on the area where they live, and administrative problems in accessing treatment. These factors are addressed in a proposed care pathway. Conclusions: With respect to mhGAP in the department of Chocó, despite adequate acceptability, access, and supervision, there are barriers and challenges at the social, geographical, political, cultural, and health administration levels, which could be overcome through implementation of locally-built intersectoral recovery routes.

Indexed as

barriers to access of health servicesColombiaImplementation sciencemental healthprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID37881801
PMCPMC10597394
OpenAlexW4387909374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.