ArticleACS catalysis2023
Reformulating Reactivity Design for Data-Efficient Machine Learning.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the Reactivity of Acyclic Silylenes and Germylenes in Hydrogen Activation Using Machine Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Computational tools for the prediction of site- and regioselectivity of organic reactions.Chemical science · 2025Review
- 3DReact: Geometric Deep Learning for Chemical Reactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Reformulating Reactivity Design for Data-Efficient Machine Learning.ACS catalysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) can deliver rapid and accurate reaction barrier predictions for use in rational reactivity design. However, model training requires large data sets of typically thousands or tens of thousands of barriers that are very expensive to obtain computationally or experimentally. Furthermore, bespoke data sets are required for each region of interest in reaction space as models typically struggle to generalize. We have therefore reformulated the ML barrier prediction problem toward a much more data-efficient process: finding a reaction from a prespecified set with a desired target value. Our reformulation enables the rapid selection of reactions with purpose-specific activation barriers, for example, in the design of reactivity and selectivity in synthesis, catalyst design, toxicology, and covalent drug discovery, requiring just tens of accurately measured barriers. Importantly, our reformulation does not require generalization beyond the domain of the data set at hand, and we show excellent results for the highly toxicologically and synthetically relevant data sets of aza-Michael addition and transition-metal-catalyzed dihydrogen activation, typically requiring less than 20 accurately measured density functional theory (DFT) barriers. Even for incomplete data sets of E2 and S
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.