Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881689›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2023

DNA damage and repair: underlying mechanisms leading to microcephaly.

Jessica Honorato Ribeiro, Nazlican Altinisik, Nicholas Rajan, Mieke Verslegers, Sarah Baatout, Jay Gopalakrishnan, Roel Quintens

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing DNA Damage Through the Cell Cycle Using Flow Cytometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica Honorato RibeiroRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Nazlican AltinisikLaboratory for Centrosome and Cytoskeleton Biology, Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nicholas RajanRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Mieke VerslegersRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Sarah BaatoutRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Jay GopalakrishnanLaboratory for Centrosome and Cytoskeleton Biology, Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Roel QuintensRadiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre · BEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEGhent University · BEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-damaging agents and endogenous DNA damage constantly harm genome integrity. Under genotoxic stress conditions, the DNA damage response (DDR) machinery is crucial in repairing lesions and preventing mutations in the basic structure of the DNA. Different repair pathways are implicated in the resolution of such lesions. For instance, the non-homologous DNA end joining and homologous recombination pathways are central cellular mechanisms by which eukaryotic cells maintain genome integrity. However, defects in these pathways are often associated with neurological disorders, indicating the pivotal role of DDR in normal brain development. Moreover, the brain is the most sensitive organ affected by DNA-damaging agents compared to other tissues during the prenatal period. The accumulation of lesions is believed to induce cell death, reduce proliferation and premature differentiation of neural stem and progenitor cells, and reduce brain size (microcephaly). Microcephaly is mainly caused by genetic mutations, especially genes encoding proteins involved in centrosomes and DNA repair pathways. However, it can also be induced by exposure to ionizing radiation and intrauterine infections such as the Zika virus. This review explains mammalian cortical development and the major DNA repair pathways that may lead to microcephaly when impaired. Next, we discuss the mechanisms and possible exposures leading to DNA damage and p53 hyperactivation culminating in microcephaly.

Indexed as

DNA damageDNA repair deficiencyDNA repair pathwaysionizing radiationmicrocephalyneurodevelopmentp53Zika virus

Identifiers

PMID37881689
PMCPMC10597653
OpenAlexW4387500490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.