Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881621›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023

A Nurse-Led Model of Care with Telemonitoring to Manage Patients with Heart Failure in Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study.

Jessica Longhini, Federica Canzan, Paola Zambiasi, Stefano Toccoli, Lorenzo Gios, Maurizio Del Greco, Simona Sforzin, Monica Moz, Michela Fracchetti, Luisa Saiani and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica LonghiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Federica CanzanDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paola ZambiasiAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Stefano ToccoliAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Lorenzo GiosTrentinoSalute4.0, Competence Center for Digital Health, Trento, Italy.
Maurizio Del GrecoAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Simona SforzinAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Monica MozTrentinoSalute4.0, Competence Center for Digital Health, Trento, Italy.
Michela FracchettiAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Luisa SaianiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Renata BrolisAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Annamaria GuarnierAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Mariangela SoveriniAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Massimiliano MainesAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Elisa AmbrosiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Provincia Autonoma di Trento · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a nurse-led care model with telemonitoring in primary care for patients with stable heart failure and their caregivers is feasible and acceptable. Patients and Methods: A mixed-methods feasibility study was conducted. Patients with stable heart failure and their caregivers were consecutively enrolled from March 2021 to April 2022. Participants were managed by nurses in a community health center through education and monitoring with a mobile app. The outcomes were feasibility outcomes, self-care outcomes, and qualitative acceptability and satisfaction. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes were linked to understanding how the model of care might benefit patients. Results: Twenty-six patients and nine of their caregivers were enrolled. Ten participants used the mobile app. Nineteen patients and eight caregivers were interviewed. Participants who improved their self-care appreciated the help in finding coping strategies, being close to the clinic, and feeling cared for. Participants with fewer improvements in self-care perceived the model of care as useless and were far from the centre. Participants decided to use the app mainly for usefulness prevision, and most of them were satisfied. Conclusion: The model of care was not successful in recruiting patients, and adjustments are needed to improve the recruitment strategy and to engage people who perceive the model of care as not useful or unable to use the app.

Indexed as

cardiologygeneral practiceheart failurenursingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID37881621
PMCPMC10595161
OpenAlexW4387837098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.