Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881544›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2023

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Heart-Brain Coupling: Implications for Site Selection and Frontal Thresholding-Preliminary Findings.

Eva Dijkstra, Hanneke van Dijk, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Lauren Zwienenberg, Renée Rouwhorst, John P Coetzee, Daniel M Blumberger, Jonathan Downar, Nolan Williams, Alexander T Sack and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07684911 (Longitudinal Study on the Sustainability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols - Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07684911 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Longitudinal Study on the Sustainability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocols - Biomarkers

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Center Guillaume RégnierRan2026 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive Disorder, Depression Bipolar, Depression UnipolarArmsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The future of brain circuit-targeted therapeutics.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eva DijkstraHeart & Brain Group, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Hanneke van DijkHeart & Brain Group, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Fidel Vila-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lauren ZwienenbergHeart & Brain Group, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Renée RouwhorstHeart & Brain Group, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
John P CoetzeeDepartment Of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Daniel M BlumbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan DownarDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nolan WilliamsDepartment Of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Alexander T SackDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Martijn ArnsHeart & Brain Group, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurocardiac-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses repetitive TMS (rTMS)-induced heart rate deceleration to confirm activation of the frontal-vagal pathway. Here, we test a novel neurocardiac-guided TMS method that utilizes heart-brain coupling (HBC) to quantify rTMS-induced entrainment of the interbeat interval as a function of TMS cycle time. Because prior neurocardiac-guided TMS studies indicated no association between motor and frontal excitability threshold, we also introduce the approach of using HBC to establish individualized frontal excitability thresholds for optimally dosing frontal TMS. Methods: In studies 1A and 1B, we validated intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)-induced HBC (2 seconds iTBS on; 8 seconds off: HBC = 0.1 Hz) in 15 (1A) and 22 (1B) patients with major depressive disorder from 2 double-blind placebo-controlled studies. In study 2, HBC was measured in 10 healthy subjects during the 10-Hz "Dash" protocol (5 seconds 10-Hz on; 11 seconds off: HBC = 0.0625 Hz) applied with 15 increasing intensities to 4 evidence-based TMS locations. Results: Using blinded electrocardiogram-based HBC analysis, we successfully identified sham from real iTBS sessions (accuracy: study 1A = 83%, study 1B = 89.5%) and found a significantly stronger HBC at 0.1 Hz in active compared with sham iTBS ( Conclusions: We demonstrated rTMS-induced HBC as a function of TMS cycle time for 2 commonly used clinical protocols (iTBS and 10-Hz Dash). These preliminary results supported individual site specificity and dose-response effects, indicating that this is a potentially valuable method for clinical rTMS site stratification and frontal thresholding. Further research should control for TMS side effects, such as pain of stimulation, to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Dash rTMSFrontal-vagal networkHeart-brain couplingHeart rateiTBS, NCG-TMS

Identifiers

PMID37881544
PMCPMC10593873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.