SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential of neoadjuvant hepatic artery perfusion chemotherapy in improving surgical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of TACE/HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy versus targeted immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence summary of nursing care of arterial drug administration and catheter management for HAIC in hepatocellular carcinoma.Medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating second-line therapy after immunotherapy in advanced HCC☆.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- CYP8B1 is a prognostic biomarker with important functional implications in hepatocellular carcinoma.Oncology reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: survival outcomes and prognostic factors from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy: A resurgence.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Similar Efficacy Between Atezolizumab Plus BevacizumabIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh class B.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the effects of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with or without systemic chemotherapy compared to systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Following a registered protocol (PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023386780 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023386780), a comprehensive search was performed using reputable databases and registries up to December 26, 2022, with no language, publication date, or status restrictions. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of HAIC with or without systemic chemotherapy versus systemic therapy alone were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). A random-effects model was used, and the certainty of the evidence was rated using GRADE. Results: Seven RCTs involving 1,010 patients were included. All trials utilized sorafenib as the comparator. Five trials (690 patients) compared HAIC plus sorafenib to sorafenib alone, while two trials (320 patients) compared HAIC to sorafenib. The results indicate that HAIC, with or without sorafenib, may increase OS, PFS, and ORR compared with sorafenib alone. HAIC may enhance DCR, but the evidence is very uncertain. Adverse events were comparable between HAIC plus sorafenib and sorafenib alone. However, adverse events might be decreased in HAIC alone. Discussion: HAIC with or without systemic chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes and response rates of patients with HCC. Since the current body of evidence is moderate to very low, more robust randomized trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of HAIC. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=386780, identifier CRD42023386780.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.