Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881470›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2023

EXPERTS II - How are patient and caregiver participation in health and social care shaped by experienced burden of treatment and social inequalities? Protocol for a qualitative synthesis.

Carl R May, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Katie I Gallacher, Katja C Gravenhorst, Frances S Mair, Ellen Nolte, Alison Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carl R MayDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-9981
Katie I GallacherSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Katja C GravenhorstDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-8260
Frances S MairSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-1135
Ellen NolteDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alison RichardsonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The workload health and social care service users and caregivers take on, and their capacity to do this work is important. It may play a key part in shaping the implementation of innovations in health service delivery and organisation; the utilisation and satisfaction with services; and the outcomes of care. Previous research has often focused on experiences of a narrow range of long-term conditions, and on factors that shape adherence to self-care regimes. Aims: With the aim of deriving policy and practice implications for service redesign, this evidence synthesis will extend our understanding of service user and caregiver workload and capacity by comparing how they are revealed in qualitative studies of lived experience of three kinds of illness trajectories: long-term conditions associated with significant disability (Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia); serious relapsing remitting disease (Inflammatory Bowel Disease, bipolar disorder); and rapidly progressing acute disease (brain cancer, early onset dementia). Methods: We will review and synthesise qualitative studies of lived experience of participation in health and social care that are shaped by interactions between experienced treatment burdens, social inequalities and illness trajectories. The review will involve:   1.  Construction of a theory-informed coding manual; systematic search of bibliographic databases to identify, screen and quality assess full-text papers.   2.  Analysis of papers using manual coding techniques, and text mining software; construction of taxonomies of service user and caregiver work and capacity.   3.  Designing a model of core components and identifying common factors across conditions, trajectories, and contexts.   4.  Work with practitioners, and a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) group, to explore the validity of the models produced; to develop workload reduction strategies; and to consider person-centred service design. Dissemination: We will promote workload reduction models to support service users and caregivers and produce policy briefs and peer-reviewed publications for practitioners, policy-makers, and researchers.

Indexed as

Burden of treatmentIllness trajectoriesQualitative evidence synthesisSocial inequalities

Identifiers

PMID37881470
PMCPMC10593344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.