SynthesisNIHR open research2023
What are women's experiences of seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth? A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in NIHR open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Attitudes of maternity care providers toward regional centralisation of vaginal breech birth: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Experience of decision-making for home breech birth: An interpretive description.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2024Article
- The feasibility of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1): an observational implementation feasibility study in preparation for a pilot trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- How safe is it to plan a vaginal breech birth with OptiBreech collaborative care?: analysis of cumulative data within the OptiBreech Multiple Trials Cohort.NIHR open research · 2023Article
- The OptiBreech Trial Feasibility Study: A Qualitative Inventory of the Roles and Responsibilities of Breech Specialist Midwives.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines for breech management at term emphasise choice and informed decision-making. Despite this, the choice of vaginal breech birth (VBB), is not always available or accessible. We aimed to describe the experiences of women seeking a VBB as reported in primary research and to offer strategies for improving this experience that are grounded in evidence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of the results, using grounded theory analysis methods (PROSPERO registration CRD42021262380), with literature published between January 2000 and February 2022. Seven databases were searched. Our review included literature about women with breech presentation, who sought a planned or unplanned VBB. Studies considering only experiences of alternative management (e.g. caesarean, external cephalic version), and those investigating healthcare workers' experiences were excluded. Covidence systematic review software was used for screening and quality assessment. Qualitative data were extracted using NVivo software (20.5.0). Data were analysed through an iterative process based on constant comparison methods, with an iterative and reflexive code generation process. Codes were then arranged into 'categories of experience', which gave rise to over-arching themes. Results: Our review included 19 studies. We present one overarching theory: 'Women who wish to plan a vaginal breech birth seek connected autonomy'. Our schematic, depicting this theory, includes seven main categories of experience: paternalistic healthcare; emotional turmoil; judgement and self-doubt; mother vs society: refusing to conform; isolated but united by breech; welcomed direction; and supported self-determination and self-efficacy. Conclusions: Women seeking to plan a VBB feel vulnerable and wish to connect with capable and confident healthcare providers. To meet their needs, services should be designed so that they can connect with clinicians who are willing and able to support their autonomy. Services should also seek to limit their exposure to disrespectful and judgemental interactions with healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.