Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881462›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2023

Crisis care for children and young people with mental health problems: national mapping, models of delivery, sustainability and experience (CAMH-Crisis2). A study protocol.

Clare Bennett, Ben Hannigan, Mair B Elliott, Martin Elliott, Nicola Evans, Claire Fraser, Euan Hails, Aled Jones, Iain McMillan, Steven Pryjmachuk and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clare BennettSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-3894
Ben HanniganSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-6721
Mair B ElliottIndependent consultant, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-436X
Martin ElliottCASCADE School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Nicola EvansSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-0478
Claire FraserSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-3168
Euan HailsNHS Wales Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Wales, UK.
Aled JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England, PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-8236
Iain McMillanBridgend County Borough Council, Bridgend, UK.
Steven PryjmachukSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK.
Leanne SawleSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-8816
Rachael VaughanCASCADE School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-8647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: One in six five 16-year-olds have a probable mental health difficulty. Of these, almost half of older teenagers and a quarter of 11-16-year-olds report having self-harmed or attempted suicide. Currently, there is little research into mental health crisis services for young people, with little understanding of what services exist, who uses them, or what works best. Question: 'How are mental health crisis responses for children and young people up to the age of 25 sustained, experienced and integrated within their local systems of services'? Objectives: 1.    To describe National Health Service (NHS), local authority, education and third sector approaches to the implementation and organisation of crisis care for children and young people across England and Wales.    2.   To identify eight contrasting case studies in which to evaluate how crisis services have developed and are currently organised, sustained, experienced and integrated within the context of their local systems of services.    3.   To compare and contrast these services in the context of the available international evidence, drawing out and disseminating clear implications for the design and delivery of future crisis responses for children and young people and their families. Methods: A sequential mixed methods approach, underpinned by normalisation process theory will be employed. A survey will create a detailed record of how crisis responses across England and Wales are organised, implemented and used. Subsequently, eight contrasting services in relation to geographic and socioeconomic setting, populations served, and service configuration will be identified as case studies. Interviews will be conducted with children, young people and parents/carers who have used the service, as well as commissioners, managers and practitioners. Operational policies and service usage data will also be examined. Analysis of how each service is provided, experienced, implemented and sustained will be conducted both inductively and deductively, reflecting normalisation process theory constructs.

Indexed as

Mental health crisis; children and young people; crisis services; service models; normalisation process theory; sequential mixed methods; case study; qualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37881462
PMCPMC10593319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.