Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881449›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2023

Acceptability, fidelity and trial experience of four intervention components to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer: A process evaluation protocol for a pilot fractional factorial trial.

Sophie M C Green, Louise H Hall, Nikki Rousseau, David P French, Christopher D Graham, Michelle Collinson, Ellen Mason, Hollie Wilkes, Daniel Howdon, Robbie Foy and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie M C GreenLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-5377
Louise H HallLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Nikki RousseauLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
David P FrenchManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-7804
Christopher D GrahamDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5BN, Ireland.
Michelle CollinsonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Ellen MasonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Hollie WilkesLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Daniel HowdonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8052-2893
Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0605-7713
Rebecca WalwynLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Jane ClarkDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1882-666X
Catherine ParbuttMedicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4047-0345
Erin RaineLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Rachel EllisonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-492X
Jacqueline BuxtonIndependent Researcher, Leeds, UK.
Sally J L MooreIndependent Researcher, Leeds, UK.
Galina VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Amanda FarrinLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
Samuel G SmithLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Refining and Optimising a behavioural intervention to Support Endocrine Therapy Adherence (ROSETA) programme has developed four intervention components aiming to improve medication adherence in women with early-stage breast cancer. These are (a) text messages, (b) information leaflet, (c) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help (ACT), (d) side-effect management website. Guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy, our pilot trial will use a fractional factorial design to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a larger optimisation trial. The pilot will include a process evaluation to maximise learning regarding the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention components before proceeding with a larger trial. The trial process evaluation has three aims: to assess the (1) fidelity and (2) acceptability of the intervention components; and (3) to understand participant's trial experience, and barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Methods: The process evaluation will use multiple methods. Fidelity of the intervention components will be assessed using self-reported questionnaire data, trial data on intervention component adherence, and observations of the ACT sessions. Acceptability of the intervention components and trial experience will be explored using an acceptability questionnaire and interviews with patients and trial therapists. Trial experience will be assessed using a questionnaire and interviews with participants, while barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention will be assessed using a questionnaire completed by research nurses and participant interviews. The pilot trial opened for recruitment on 20th May 2022 and was open at the time of submission. Conclusions: This process evaluation will provide information regarding whether the intervention components can be delivered with fidelity within a national healthcare setting and are acceptable to participants. We will also better understand participant experience in a pilot trial with a fractional factorial design, and any barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Registration: ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN10487576, 16/12/2021).

Indexed as

acceptabilityfractional factorialintervention fidelityprocess evaluationtrial experience

Identifiers

PMID37881449
PMCPMC10593334
OpenAlexW4366830309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.