ArticleCureus2023
Developing a Risk Stratification Model Based on Machine Learning for Targeted Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in the Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a predictive risk score model based on deep learning (DL) independent of fundus photography, totally reliant on systemic data through targeted screening from a population-based study to diagnose diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the Indian population.
methodsIt involved machine learning application on datasets of a cross-sectional population-based study. A total of 1425 subjects (1175 subjects with known diabetes and 250 with newly diagnosed diabetes) were included in the study. We applied five machine learning algorithms, random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and decision trees (DT), to predict diabetic retinopathy in our datasets. We incorporated a percentage split in the first experiment and randomly divided our data set into 80% as a training set and 20% as a test set. We performed a three-way data split in the second experiment to prevent overestimating predictive performance. We randomly divided our data set into 60% as a training set, 20% as a validation set, and 20% as the test set. Furthermore, we integrated five-fold cross-validation to split the percentage to evaluate our method. We judged the predictive performance based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe RF classifier achieved the best prediction performance with AUC, Acc, and sensitivity values of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively, in the percentage split. Similarly, a three-way data split attained an outcome of 0.86 and 0.85 in AUC and Acc. Likewise, the five-fold cross-validation performed the best with results of 0.90, 0.97, 0.91, and 0.75 in AUC, Acc, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively.
conclusionSince the RF classifier achieved the best performance, we propose it to identify diabetic retinopathy for targeted screening in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.