Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881372›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Reperfusion Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke Beyond the Conventional Time Window: A Narrative Review.

Mohammad Mansour

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The nonlinear trajectory of post-stroke aphasia recovery.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mohammad MansourDepartment of General Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, HUN.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the second most common cause of death worldwide, with 50% of survivors experiencing long-term disability. For more than two decades, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical endovascular thrombectomy (MET), the only approved stroke reperfusion therapies, was restricted to patients within the 4.5-6 hour time window, respectively. Therefore, patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond the conventional time window were excluded from reperfusion treatment. This narrative review aims to review the scientific literature on the possibilities of reperfusion therapies for patients who present with an unknown time of stroke onset, and those with stroke onset beyond the conventional 4.5-6 hour time window. Beyond the conventional time window, the eligibility of patients for IVT or MET, the two main therapeutic procedures, is decided based on the concept of penumbral imaging. Penumbral imaging identifies patients with hypoperfused but viable brain tissue, who could benefit from reperfusion. On the other hand, clock-based DWI-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect stroke that has occurred within 4.5 hours in patients with an unknown time of onset, including patients who awaken with stroke. The introduction of penumbral imaging and MRI-based tissue clocking as imaging biomarkers for stroke has revolutionized stroke therapy, potentially allowing for personalized treatment of eligible stroke patients.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokediffusion-weighted imagingflairintravenous thrombolysismechanical thrombectomypenumbraperfusion ctreperfusion therapiesstroke

Identifiers

PMID37881372
PMCPMC10597672
OpenAlexW4386994575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.