ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Ethics in Clinical Orthopedic Surgery.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implant Design and Its Applications in the Fixation of Osteoporotic Bones: Newer Technologies in Nails, Plates and External Fixators.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Ethics in orthopaedic surgery practice: balancing patient care and technological advances.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Exploring Ethical Challenges in Orthopedic Practice.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Emerging Technologies in Hand Orthopedic Surgery: Current Trends and Future Directions.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Orthopedic surgeons, owing to their specialized role, have a set of medical and moral responsibilities that span beyond the confines of the operating room. The primary objective of this exploration is to emphasize the pivotal ethical and professional standards that these surgeons should uphold. Methodology: We derived key ethical and professional aspects by reviewing standard medical practices, professional guidelines, and through consultations with senior orthopedic professionals. These aspects covered both the conduct inside the surgery room and the interpersonal relations outside. Results: Several core areas of conduct were identified.Patient-Centered Care: Prioritizing the holistic well-being of the patient.Communication: Ensuring that all communications are both transparent and respectful.Informed Consent: Properly securing consent after ensuring the patient is adequately informed.Confidentiality: Taking measures to safeguard patient information.Professional Behavior: Upholding the highest standards of professional conduct.Continuous Learning: Remaining committed to updating skills and enhancing competence.Interpersonal Relations: Building healthy and constructive relationships with industry representatives, professional peers, and hospital staff.Personal Life Balance: Recognizing the importance of a balanced personal and professional life for holistic well-being. Conclusion: For Orthopedic surgeons, strict adherence to the outlined ethical and professional principles is essential. Such commitment not only ensures the trust and safety of patients but also serves to maintain and elevate the prestigious standing of the orthopedic community in the broader medical landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.