ArticleJournal of pain research2023
Effects of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine on Hemodynamic Profiles and Block Characteristics Among Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative hemodynamics and anesthetic implications in superobese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaineWorld journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Does Ropivacaine Offer Hemodynamic Advantages Over Bupivacaine?Cureus · 2025Article
- Precision Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia: An Attempt to Assess the Emerging Modalities within the Fundamental Framework.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure where the baby is delivered through incisions made in the abdomen and uterus. Bupivacaine is a widely recognized local anesthetic available in different baricity and it is frequently used for spinal anesthesia. The baricity of bupivacaine impacts hemodynamic profiles and block characteristics. Objective: To compare the effects of hyperbaric and isobaric bupivacaine on hemodynamic profiles and block characteristics among parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at Dilla University Referral Hospital. Methods: 64 pregnant mothers scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received a dose of 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine (n = 32), Group B received a dose of 12.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (n = 32). Prior to conducting the study, the necessary ethical approvals were obtained. For comparing numerical variables between the two groups, the independent Sample Results: The mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood pressure (DBP), and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP) showed significant decrement in the group receiving isobaric spinal anesthesia compared to those receiving hyperbaric bupivacaine. The decrement was observed from the 6th to 30th minute (p<0.05). Furthermore, the hyperbaric group had a faster onset time for achieving the maximum sensory block, with a median time of 3 (1) min compared to 4 (2) mins in the isobaric group (p<0.001). Conclusion and Recommendation: We conclude that hyperbaric bupivacaine provides stable intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and an earlier onset of block than isobaric bupivacaine. Therefore, we recommend clinicians to use hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.