Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881209›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

Medical Specialty Classification Based on Semiadversarial Data Augmentation.

Huan Zhang, Dong Zhu, Hao Tan, Muhammad Shafiq, Zhaoquan Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huan ZhangCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Dong ZhuCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao TanCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Muhammad ShafiqCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-9373
Zhaoquan GuDepartment of New Networks, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7546-852X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly increasing adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems has caused automated medical specialty classification to become an important research field. Medical specialty classification not only improves EHR system retrieval efficiency and helps general practitioners identify urgent patient issues but also is useful in studying the practice and validity of clinical referral patterns. However, currently available medical note data are imbalanced and insufficient. In addition, medical specialty classification is a multicategory problem, and it is not easy to remove sensitive information from numerous medical notes and tag them. To solve those problems, we propose a data augmentation method based on adversarial attacks. The semiadversarial examples generated during the dynamic process of adversarial attacking are added to the training set as augmented examples, which can effectively expand the coverage of the training data on the decision space. Besides, as nouns in medical notes are critical information, we design a classification framework incorporating probabilistic information of nouns, with confidence recalculation after the softmax layer. We validate our proposed method on an 18-class dataset with extremely unbalanced data, and comparison experiments with four benchmarks show that our method improves accuracy and

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedicineHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37881209
PMCPMC10597728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.