Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37881121›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989)2023

Contraceptive effects on the cervicovaginal microbiome: Recent evidence including randomized trials.

Christina Balle, Anna-Ursula Happel, Renee Heffron, Heather B Jaspan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina BalleDivision of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
Anna-Ursula HappelDivision of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
Renee HeffronUniversity of Washington Department of Global Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Heather B JaspanDivision of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0745-6073

Funding

Effects of Hormonal Contraceptives on Genital Immunity and HIV SusceptibilityR01HD089831 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEFFRON, RENEE A., JASPAN, HEATHER BERYL · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089831NIH HHS R01 HD089831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil recently, most data regarding the effects of non-barrier contraceptives on the mucosal microbiome have derived from observational studies, which are potentially biased due to behavioral confounders that may mask their true biological effects. METHOD OF STUDY: This narrative review summarises recent evidence of the effect of contraceptives on the cervicovaginal microbiome, emphasising data obtained through randomized trials.

resultsGood quality data describe that initiation of long-acting progestin-only contraceptives, including levonorgestrel (LNG)-implant and the injectables depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) do not alter the mucosal microbial environment. Likewise, no strong evidence exists that the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) is associated with alterations of the vaginal microbiome or increased risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Limited data on the effect of intravaginal rings (IVRs) on the mucosal environment exist and show conflicting effects on the vaginal microbiota. Copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) initiation has been associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) acquisition, including in a randomized trial. LNG-IUDs may have similar affects but need to be evaluated further.

conclusionDifferent synthetic hormones have divergent effects on the microbiome and therefore novel hormonal methods need to be rigorously evaluated. Furthermore, the addition of antiretrovirals into multipurpose technologies may alter the effects of the hormonal component. There is thus a critical need to improve our understanding of the biological effects of contraceptive hormones and delivery methods with different pharmacokinetic and chemical properties on the mucosal microbiome in rigorous trials, to inform the development of novel contraceptives and improve individual family planning guidance.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, FemaleMicrobiotaContraceptive AgentsFemaleHormonesHumansLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleHormonesLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone Acetatehormonal contraceptionmicrobiotamucosareproductive healthsexual health

Identifiers

PMID37881121
PMCPMC10696626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.