Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880770›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Single-port three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic-assisted breast surgery-preliminary results and patient-reported satisfaction in 145 breast cancer and gynecomastia cases.

Clement Luck Khng Chia, Chayanee Sae-Lim, Hung-Wen Lai, Korawan Chandrachamnong, Hsin-I Huang, Dar-Ren Chen, Shou-Tung Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparative outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic-assisted surgery for breast phyllodes tumors: a single center retrospective cohort study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clement Luck Khng Chia *Department of Surgery, Breast Surgery Service, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-9348
Chayanee Sae-Lim *Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1991-8802
Hung-Wen LaiDepartment of Surgery, Endoscopic & Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanxiao Street, Changhua, 500, Taiwan. hwlai650420@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-2013
Korawan ChandrachamnongDepartment of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4044-7087
Hsin-I HuangDepartment of Information Management, National Sun-Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-491X
Dar-Ren ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0897-4374
Shou-Tung ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-6963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimal-accessed (robotic and endoscopic) breast cancer surgery is increasingly performed due to better cosmetic results and acceptable oncological outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical safety and patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction of single-port three-dimensional endoscopic-assisted breast surgery (S-P 3D EABS), which is our new endoscopic surgical innovation, in both malignant and benign breast conditions.

methodsPatients who underwent S-P 3D EABS from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2022 in a single institution were enrolled. Clinical outcomes of this procedure were retrospectively reviewed, and the patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated by a questionnaire and reported herein.

resultsDuring the study period, 145 patients underwent 164 procedures of S-P 3D EABS. One hundred fifty (91.5%) procedures were endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (S-P 3D E-NSM; 117 therapeutic procedures for breast cancer, 13 prophylactic mastectomies, 20 procedures for gynecomastia). Fourteen (8.5%) procedures of endoscopic-assisted breast-conserving surgery (S-P 3D E-BCS) were performed (12 S-P 3D E-BCS, 2 S-P 3D E-BCS with 3D videoscope-assisted partial breast reconstruction, which was 1 case of latissimus dorsi flap and 1 case of omental flap). The mean operative time was 245 ± 110 min in S-P 3D E-NSM and 260 ± 142 min in S-P 3D E-BCS. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 49.7 ± 46.9 ml in S-P 3D E-NSM and 32.8 ± 17.5 ml in S-P 3D E-BCS. Subnipple biopsy showed positive malignancy in 3 (2.6%) S-P 3D E-NSM patients. None of the S-P 3D E-BCS patients found margin involvement; however, 3 (2.6%) reported margin involvement in S-P 3D E-NSM patients. Thirty-two complications were found (24.6%): 7 (5.3%) transient nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia, 7 (5.3%) partial NAC necrosis, 1 (0.7%) total NAC necrosis, and 1 (0.7%) implant loss. During the mean follow-up time of 34 months, there were 2 (1.5%) patients with locoregional recurrence, 9 (6.9%) distant metastasis, and 2 (1.5%) mortality. 78.6% (77/98) of patients answering the cosmetic-evaluated questionnaire reported good and excellent overall satisfaction.

conclusionsS-P 3D EABS is a novel surgical innovation, which is able to perform safely in either malignant or benign breast conditions and offer promising cosmetic results.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGynecomastiaMammaplastyFemaleHumansMastectomyNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerBreast-conserving surgery (BCS)Endoscopic-assisted breast surgery (EABS)Endoscopic gynecomastia surgeryNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM)Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM)Single-port 3-dimensional (3D) endoscopic-assisted breast surgery

Identifiers

PMID37880770
PMCPMC10601236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.