Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880728›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Assessing the effects of a mentoring program on professional identity formation.

Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Anushka Pisupati, Yun Ting Ong, Kelly Jia Hui Teo, Mac Yu Kai Teo, Vaishnavi Venktaramana, Chrystie Wan Ning Quek, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Harpreet Singh and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lalit Kumar Radha KrishnaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore. lalit.radha-krishna@liverpool.ac.uk.
Anushka PisupatiYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Yun Ting OngYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Kelly Jia Hui TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Mac Yu Kai TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Vaishnavi VenktaramanaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Chrystie Wan Ning QuekYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Keith Zi Yuan ChuaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Vijayprasanth RaveendranYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Harpreet SinghYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Sabine Lauren Chyi Hui WongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Victoria Wen Wei NgYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Eleanor Kei Ying LohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
Ting Ting YeohDivision of Oncology Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jasmine Lerk Juan OwyongDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Min ChiamDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng Koon OngDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Gillian Li Gek PhuaDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ruaraidh HillHealth Data Science, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, L3 9TA, Liverpool, UK.
Simon Yew Kuang OngDivision of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical education has enjoyed mixed fortunes nurturing professional identity formation (PIF), or how medical students think, feel and act as physicians. New data suggests that structured mentoring programs like the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI) may offer a means of developing PIF in a consistent manner. To better understand how a well-established structured research mentoring program shapes PIF, a study of the experiences of PMI mentees is proposed. METHODOLOGY: Acknowledging PIF as a sociocultural construct, a Constructivist approach and Relativist lens were adopted for this study. In the absence of an effective tool, the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) and Krishna-Pisupati Model (KPM) model were used to direct this dual Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (Dual-SEBA) study in designing, employing and analysing semi-structured interviews with PMI mentees and mentoring diaries. These served to capture changes in PIF over the course of the PMI's mentoring stages. Transcripts of the interviews and mentoring diaries were concurrently analysed using content and thematic analysis. Complementary themes and categories identified from the Split Approach were combined using the Jigsaw Approach and subsequently compared with mentoring diaries in the Funnelling Process. The domains created framed the discussion.

resultsA total of 12 mentee interviews and 17 mentoring diaries were analysed, revealing two domains-PMI as a Community of Practice (CoP) and Identity Formation. The domains confirmed the centrality of a structured CoP capable of facilitating longitudinal mentoring support and supporting the Socialisation Process along the mentoring trajectory whilst cultivating personalised and enduring mentoring relationships.

conclusionThe provision of a consistent mentoring approach and personalised, longitudinal mentoring support guided along the mentoring trajectory by structured mentoring assessments lay the foundations for more effective mentoring programs. The onus must now be on developing assessment tools, such as a KPM-based tool, to guide support and oversight of mentoring relationships.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalMentoringPhysiciansHumansMentorsSocial IdentificationAssessmentCommunity of practiceEducation environmentMedicineMentoringPalliative medicinePersonhoodProfessional identity formationProfessionalismSocialisation process

Identifiers

PMID37880728
PMCPMC10601320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.