ArticleBMC medicine2023
Shoulder replacement surgery's rising demand, inequality of provision, and variation in outcomes: cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics for England.
Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the role of hemiarthroplasty in revision shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Geographic retention and gender-based trends among orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeons in the United States.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Primary shoulder arthroplasty trends in Sweden: a 16-year observational study from 2008 to 2023.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- [Surgical revision for instability following reverse shoulder arthroplasty].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2026Article
- Predictors of prolonged length of stay in shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
- Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a day case procedure: a population-based cohort study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- The relationship between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury in elderly and super elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Epidemiological Trends and Age-Related Outcomes in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Analysis of 9692 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Bone cement implantation syndrome: a scoping review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty by indication : a National Joint Registry study.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Infection after shoulder replacement: A literature review and strategies on diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
- Article
- Management of periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty secondary to rotator cuff arthropathy in a low-income population.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to forecast future patient demand for shoulder replacement surgery in England and investigate any geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in service provision and patient outcomes.
methodsFor this cohort study, all elective shoulder replacements carried out by NHS hospitals and NHS-funded care in England from 1999 to 2020 were identified using Hospital Episode Statistics data. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older. Shoulder replacements for malignancy or acute trauma were excluded. Population estimates and projections were obtained from the Office for National Statistics. Standardised incidence rates and the risks of serious adverse events (SAEs) and revision surgery were calculated and stratified by geographical region, socioeconomic deprivation, sex, and age band. Hospital costs for each admission were calculated using Healthcare Resource Group codes and NHS Reference Costs based on the National Reimbursement System. Projected rates and hospital costs were predicted until the year 2050 for two scenarios of future growth.
resultsA total of 77,613 elective primary and 5847 revision shoulder replacements were available for analysis. Between 1999 and 2020, the standardised incidence of primary shoulder replacements in England quadrupled from 2.6 to 10.4 per 100,000 population, increasing predominantly in patients aged over 65 years. As many as 1 in 6 patients needed to travel to a different region for their surgery indicating inequality of service provision. A temporal increase in SAEs was observed: the 30-day risk increased from 1.3 to 4.8% and the 90-day risk increased from 2.4 to 6.0%. Patients from the more deprived socioeconomic groups appeared to have a higher risk of SAEs and revision surgery. Shoulder replacements are forecast to increase by up to 234% by 2050 in England, reaching 20,912 procedures per year with an associated annual cost to hospitals of £235 million.
conclusionsThis study reports a rising incidence of shoulder replacements, regional disparities in service provision, and an overall increasing risk of SAEs, especially in more deprived socioeconomic groups. These findings highlight the need for better healthcare planning to match local population demand, while more research is needed to understand and prevent the increase observed in SAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.