Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880630›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Bacterial colony size growth estimation by deep learning.

Sára Ágnes Nagy, László Makrai, István Csabai, Dóra Tőzsér, Géza Szita, Norbert Solymosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sára Ágnes NagyCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078, Budapest, Hungary.
László MakraiAutovakcina Ltd, 1171, Budapest, Hungary.
István CsabaiDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
Dóra TőzsérCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078, Budapest, Hungary.
Géza SzitaCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078, Budapest, Hungary.
Norbert SolymosiCentre for Bioinformatics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078, Budapest, Hungary. solymosi.norbert@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial growth rate is important for pathogenicity and food safety. Therefore, the study of bacterial growth rate over time can provide important data from a medical and veterinary point of view. We trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on manually annotated solid medium cultures to detect bacterial colonies as accurately as possible. Predictions of bacterial colony size and growth rate were estimated from image sequences of independent Staphylococcus aureus cultures using trained CNNs. A simple linear model for control cultures with less than 150 colonies estimated that the mean growth rate was 60.3 [Formula: see text] for the first 24 h. Analyzing with a mixed effect model that also takes into account the effect of culture, smaller values of change in colony size were obtained (control: 51.0 [Formula: see text], rifampicin pretreated: 36.5[Formula: see text]). An increase in the number of neighboring colonies clearly reduces the colony growth rate in the control group but less typically in the rifampicin-pretreated group. Based on our results, CNN-based bacterial colony detection and the subsequent analysis of bacterial colony growth dynamics might become an accurate and efficient tool for bacteriological work and research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRifampinRifampinBacterial growth rateDeep learningNeural network

Identifiers

PMID37880630
PMCPMC10601293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.