Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880546›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Reconstruction of shoulder MRI using deep learning and compressed sensing: a validation study on healthy volunteers.

Thomas Dratsch, Florian Siedek, Charlotte Zäske, Kristina Sonnabend, Philip Rauen, Robert Terzis, Robert Hahnfeldt, David Maintz, Thorsten Persigehl, Grischa Bratke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Customizing native T1 mapping: The effects of compressed sensing, deep learning-based denoising, and high-resolution on measurement of native myocardial T1.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas DratschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. thomas.dratsch@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-7763
Florian SiedekDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Charlotte ZäskeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Kristina SonnabendPhilips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Röntgenstrasse 22, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
Philip RauenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Robert TerzisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Robert HahnfeldtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten PersigehlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Grischa BratkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Andra IugaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the potential of combining compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) for accelerated two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder.

methodsTwenty healthy volunteers were examined using at 3-T scanner with a fat-saturated, coronal, 2D proton density-weighted sequence with four acceleration levels (2.3, 4, 6, and 8) and a 3D sequence with three acceleration levels (8, 10, and 13), all accelerated with CS and reconstructed using the conventional algorithm and a new DL-based algorithm (CS-AI). Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blinded readers using 6 criteria on a 5-point Likert scale (overall impression, artifacts, and delineation of the subscapularis tendon, bone, acromioclavicular joint, and glenoid labrum). Objective image quality was measured by calculating signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast-to-noise-ratio, and a structural similarity index measure. All reconstructions were compared to the clinical standard (CS 2D acceleration factor 2.3; CS 3D acceleration factor 8). Additionally, subjective and objective image quality were compared between CS and CS-AI with the same acceleration levels.

resultsBoth 2D and 3D sequences reconstructed with CS-AI achieved on average significantly better subjective and objective image quality compared to sequences reconstructed with CS with the same acceleration factor (p ≤ 0.011). Comparing CS-AI to the reference sequences showed that 4-fold acceleration for 2D sequences and 13-fold acceleration for 3D sequences without significant loss of quality (p ≥ 0.058).

conclusionsFor MRI of the shoulder at 3 T, a DL-based algorithm allowed additional acceleration of acquisition times compared to the conventional approach. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The combination of deep-learning and compressed sensing hold the potential for further scan time reduction in 2D and 3D imaging of the shoulder while providing overall better objective and subjective image quality compared to the conventional approach.

trial registrationDRKS00024156. KEY POINTS: • Combination of compressed sensing and deep learning improved image quality and allows for significant acceleration of shoulder MRI. • Deep learning-based algorithm achieved better subjective and objective image quality than conventional compressed sensing. • For shoulder MRI at 3 T, 40% faster image acquisition for 2D sequences and 38% faster image acquisition for 3D sequences may be possible.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHealthy VolunteersHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingShoulderArtifactsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingShoulder joint

Identifiers

PMID37880546
PMCPMC10600091
OpenAlexW4387932594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.