SynthesisLeukemia2023
Tisagenlecleucel vs. historical standard of care in children and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Synthesis in Leukemia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infectious complications after CAR T-cell therapy: mechanisms, risk stratification, and prevention.Blood research · 2026Review
- Determinants of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Success: In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Assessment.Cancers · 2026Review
- A Review of CAR T Cells and Adoptive T-Cell Therapies in Lymphoid and Solid Organ Malignancies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Personalised Rational Drug Monitoring Combined with KABP Model Health Education to Improve Adherence and Prognosis of CAR-T Cell Therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Review
- Systemic delivery of oncolytic herpes virus using CAR-T cells enhances targeting of antitumor immuno-virotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the absence of randomized controlled trials comparing tisagenlecleucel vs. standard of care (SOC) in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL), the objective was to compare the efficacy of tisagenlecleucel with historical controls from multiple disease registries using patient-level adjustment of the historical controls. The analysis is based on patient-level data of three tisagenlecleucel studies (ELIANA, ENSIGN and CCTL019B2001X) vs. three registries in Germany/Austria. Statistical analyses were fully pre-specified and propensity score weighting of the historical controls by fine stratification weights was used to adjust for relevant confounders identified by systematic literature review. Results showed high comparability of cohorts after adjustment with absolute SMD ≤ 0.1 for all pre-specified confounders and favorable outcomes for tisagenlecleucel compared to SOC for all examined endpoints. Hazard ratios for OS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.