ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Clinical outcomes following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing combined with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone graft.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde intramedullary nailing: What differs only approach change?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough intramedullary nailing is a popular method for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, nonunion is one of the most commonly reported complications. This study aimed to evaluate the fusion rate, improvement in functional outcomes, and occurrence of complications in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde intramedullary nailing with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone graft technique. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-six consecutive patients using the proposed technique were retrospectively reviewed. For radiographic outcomes, the union rate, alignment, and any related complications were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot scale, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and visual analog scale, preoperatively and at the final follow-up.
resultsThe mean follow-up period was 38.2 months. The tibiotalar joint achieved complete union in 80.8% at six months postoperatively, while all the cases achieved complete union at 12 months postoperatively. However, the subtalar joint achieved complete union in 26.9% at six months postoperatively, which gradually increased to 73.1% at 12 months postoperatively, and 80.8% at the final follow-up without revision surgery. A subgroup analysis showed there was a trend of higher subtalar fusion rate when an additional screw for the subtalar joint fixation was placed (86.7% vs. 54.5%). The functional outcomes significantly improved at the final follow-up. A few minor complications occurred, including surgical site infection, irritational symptoms, and metal failure; however, they eventually resolved.
conclusionsOur technique of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone grafting could be a good option where both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints need to be fused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.