ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023
Evaluation of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 through dual-task paradigm: a longitudinal case-controlled study.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) was associated with cognitive alterations affecting everyday life activities. These need input integration of both motor and cognitive systems. The study aim is to evaluate cognitive-motor interference phenomenon in previously independent patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (PwMCOVID-19) compared with healthy controls (HC), through dual-task (DT) paradigm.
methodsPwMCOVID-19 were included if being independent at home, had no previous referred cognitive impairment, mechanical ventilation or oxygen need. They were assessed at admission and after 6 months with a motor-cognitive DT test (counting backward by twos while walking 2 min). HC were enrolled as control group. Differences between single-task (ST) and DT performance, DT effect (DTE) and task prioritization amongst groups and during time points were analyzed.
resultsOne-hundred PwMCOVID-19 [mean age=67.32(12.08) years; 53 M/47 F] and 39 HC [mean age=63.11(9.90) years; 20 M/19 F] were recruited. Upon T0, PwMCOVID-19 showed lower cognitive and motor DT performances than ST and HC. Mutual interference pattern was predominant in PwMCOVID-19. At T1, 41 PwMCOVID-19 were examined [mean age=64.85(10.75); 22 M/19 F]. They had a worse DT performance compared to ST, although DT improved at T1. A stronger cognitive ST-DT difference was present at T0, compared to ST-DT difference at T1, while motor ST-DT difference was unchanged over time in PwCOVID-19.
conclusionIn PwMCOVID-19, there is an impairment of DT counting while walking at baseline and after 6 months from hospitalization, with a more pronounced DT mutual interference pattern at T0. After 6 months, the motor and cognitive ST and DT performances ameliorated, not reaching the HC level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.