Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880419›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Assessing survival outcomes and complication profiles following surgical excision and radiotherapy as interventions for skull base chordoma: a systematic review of operative margins and surgical approaches.

Nolan J Brown, Julian Gendreau, Cathleen C Kuo, Oanh Nguyen, Chenyi Yang, Joshua S Catapano, Michael T Lawton

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chordoma: Genetics and Contemporary Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nolan J BrownDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Julian GendreauJohns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cathleen C KuoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Oanh NguyenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Chenyi YangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Joshua S CatapanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, 2910 North Third Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Michael T LawtonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, 2910 North Third Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA. michael.lawton@barrowbrainandspine.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite their precarious behavioral classification (benign and low grade on histopathology yet behaviorally malignant), great strides have been taken to improve prognostication and treatment paradigms for patients with skull base chordoma. With respect to surgical techniques, lateral transcranial (TC) approaches have traditionally been used, however endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) have been advocated for midline lesions. Nonetheless, due to the rarity of this pathology (0.2% of all intracranial neoplasms), investigations within the literature remain limited to small retrospective series. Furthermore, radiotherapeutic treatments investigated to date have proven largely ineffective.

methodsAccordingly, we performed a systematic review in order to profile surgical and survival outcomes for skull base chordoma. Fixed and random-effect meta-analyses were performed for categorical variables including GTR, STR, 5-year OS, 10-year OS, 5-year PFS, and 10-year PFS. Additionally, we pooled eligible studies for formal meta-analysis to compare outcomes by surgical approach (lateral versus midline). Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 'metafor' package or Cochrane Review Manager. Furthermore, meta-analysis of pooled mortality rates and sub-analyses of operative margin and surgical complications were used to compare midline versus lateral approaches via the Mantel-Haenszel method. We considered all p-values < 0.05 to be statistically significant.

resultsFollowing the systematic search and screen, 55 studies published between 1993 and 2022 reporting data for 2453 patients remained eligible for analysis. Sex distribution was comparable between males and females, with a slight predominance of male-identifying patients (0.5625 [95% CI: 0.5418; 0.3909]). Average age at diagnosis was 42.4 ± 12.5 years, while average age of treatment initiation was 43.0 ± 10.6 years. Overall, I

conclusionOverall, these results indicate good 5-year survival outcomes for patients with skull base chordoma; however, 10-year prognosis for skull base chordoma remains poor due to its radiotherapeutic resistance and high recurrence rate. Furthermore, mortality rates among patients undergoing midline versus lateral skull base approaches appear to be equivocal.

Indexed as

ChordomaHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkull Base NeoplasmsAdultCranial Fossa, PosteriorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeApproachChordomaClival chordomaClivusEEAGross total resectionLateralMidlineOverall survivalProgression free survivalSkull base

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.