Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880384›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) gynecologic procedures in morbidly and super-morbidly obese women: five year experience.

Alexander F Burnett, Thomas C Pitman, Jan F Baekelandt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Early experience with the gasless vNOTES technique for adnexal surgery.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander F BurnettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 793, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, USA. aburnett@uams.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1682-785X
Thomas C PitmanBaptist Medical Group Desoto Women's Consultants, Core Faculty, Baptist Memorial Hospital OB/GYN, Residency, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jan F BaekelandtDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Baptist Memorial Hospital · USImelda Hospital · BEUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze our experience with vNOTES gynecologic procedures in women with morbid and super morbid obesity to determine feasibility and compare outcomes with standard minimally invasive techniques.

methodsGynecologic procedures performed by three surgeons on women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m

results103 women with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m

conclusionvNOTES gynecologic procedures are feasible in this high-risk population and may result in shorter recovery times and fewer complications than standard laparoscopy or transvaginal surgery. What does this study add to the clinical work: VNOTES approach is feasible in morbidly obese women and may have distinct advantages over conventional laparoscopic, vaginal or open techniques.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryObesity, MorbidFemaleHumansHysterectomyPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUterusVaginaComplicationsGynecologic proceduresObesityvNOTES

Identifiers

PMID37880384
OpenAlexW4387948902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.