Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880354›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Audible pain squeaks can mediate emotional contagion across pre-exposed rats with a potential effect of auto-conditioning.

Julian Packheiser, Efe Soyman, Enrica Paradiso, Frédéric Michon, Eline Ramaaker, Neslihan Sahin, Sharmistha Muralidharan, Markus Wöhr, Valeria Gazzola, Christian Keysers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Julian Packheiser *Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Efe Soyman *Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-1541
Enrica Paradiso *Social Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frédéric MichonSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eline RamaakerSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neslihan SahinSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sharmistha MuralidharanSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus WöhrResearch Unit Brain and Cognition, Laboratory of Biological Psychology, Social and Affective Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-5684
Valeria GazzolaSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-0619
Christian KeysersSocial Brain Lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. c.keysers@nin.knaw.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2845-5467
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Footshock self-experience enhances rodents' reactions to the distress of others. Here, we tested one potential mechanism supporting this phenomenon, namely that animals auto-condition to their own pain squeaks during shock pre-exposure. In Experiment 1, shock pre-exposure increased freezing and 22 kHz distress vocalizations while animals listened to the audible pain-squeaks of others. In Experiment 2 and 3, to test the auto-conditioning theory, we weakened the noxious pre-exposure stimulus not to trigger pain squeaks, and compared pre-exposure protocols in which we paired it with squeak playback against unpaired control conditions. Although all animals later showed fear responses to squeak playbacks, these were weaker than following typical pre-exposure (Experiment 1) and not stronger following paired than unpaired pre-exposure. Experiment 1 thus demonstrates the relevance of audible pain squeaks in the transmission of distress but Experiment 2 and 3 highlight the difficulty to test auto-conditioning: stimuli weak enough to decouple pain experience from hearing self-emitted squeaks are too weak to trigger the experience-dependent increase in fear transmission that we aimed to study. Although our results do not contradict the auto-conditioning hypothesis, they fail to disentangle it from sensitization effects. Future studies could temporarily deafen animals during pre-exposure to further test this hypothesis.

Indexed as

FearPainAnimalsRats

Identifiers

PMID37880354
PMCPMC10600148
OpenAlexW4387934216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.