Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880320›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predicting diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer using machine learning.

Xugang Zhong, Yanze Lin, Wei Zhang, Qing Bi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early Detection of Lung Metastases in Breast Cancer Using YOLOv10 and Transfer Learning: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xugang Zhong *Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Cancer Center, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yanze Lin *Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Cancer Center, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhangCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Cancer Center, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China. 15558616750@163.com.
Qing BiCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Cancer Center, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China. bqzjsrmyy@163.com.
Qingdao Eighth People's Hospital · CNHangzhou Medical College · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at establishing more accurate predictive models based on novel machine learning algorithms, with the overarching goal of providing clinicians with effective decision-making assistance. We retrospectively analyzed the breast cancer patients recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for bone metastases in breast cancer, whereas Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for breast cancer with bone metastasis (BCBM). Based on the identified risk and prognostic factors, we developed diagnostic and prognostic models that incorporate six machine learning classifiers. We then used the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), learning curve, precision curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis to evaluate performance of the machine learning models. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that bone metastases were significantly associated with age, race, sex, grade, T stage, N stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tumor size, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, breast subtype, and PR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that age, race, marital status, grade, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, breast subtype, ER, and PR were closely associated with the prognosis of BCBM. Among the six machine learning models, the XGBoost algorithm predicted the most accurate results (Diagnostic model AUC = 0.98; Prognostic model AUC = 0.88). According to the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), the most critical feature of the diagnostic model was surgery, followed by N stage. Interestingly, surgery was also the most critical feature of prognostic model, followed by liver metastasis. Based on the XGBoost algorithm, we could effectively predict the diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer and provide targeted references for the treatment of BCBM patients.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37880320
PMCPMC10600146
OpenAlexW4387949533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.