Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880224›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

PADAPT 1.0 - the Pannonian Dataset of Plant Traits.

Judit Sonkoly, Edina Tóth, Nóra Balogh, Lajos Balogh, Dénes Bartha, Kinga Csendesné Bata, Zoltán Bátori, Nóra Békefi, Zoltán Botta-Dukát, János Bölöni and 45 more

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Ukrainian Plant Trait Database: UkrTrait v. 1.0.Biodiversity data journal · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

55 authors.

Judit Sonkoly *Department of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-5240
Edina Tóth *Department of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Nóra BaloghDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Lajos BaloghNatural History Department, Savaria Museum, Szombathely, Hungary.
Dénes BarthaInstitute of Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Kinga Csendesné BataHerman Ottó Institute Nonprofit Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán BátoriDepartment of Ecology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Nóra Békefi1016 Budapest, Piroska u. 4., Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán Botta-DukátInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
János BölöniInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Anikó CsecseritsInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0538-4520
János CsikyDepartment of Ecology, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság u. 6., Pécs, Hungary.
Péter CsontosInstitute for Soil Sciences, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
István Dancza1039 Budapest, Gyula u. 9., Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs DeákLendület Seed Ecology Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Zoltán Konstantin DobolyiHungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna E-VojtkóInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
Ferenc GyulaiInstitute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Alida Anna HábenczyusDepartment of Ecology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás HennJózsef Attila City Library and Museum Collection, Komló, Hungary.
Ferenc HorváthInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1317-1269
Mária HöhnDepartment of Botany, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Budai Campus, Budapest, Hungary.
Gusztáv JakabDepartment of Environmental and Landscape Geography, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
András KelemenDepartment of Ecology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Gergely KirályInstitute of Silviculture and Forest Protection, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Szabolcs KisDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gergely Kovacsics-VáriDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
András Kun1115 Budapest, Halmi u. 5. 3/16., Budapest, Hungary.
Éva LehoczkyDepartment of Environmental Sustainability, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Georgikon Campus, H-8360 Keszthely, Deák F. u. 16, Keszthely, Hungary.
Attila LengyelInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Barbara LhotskyInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Viktor LökiWetland Ecology Research Group, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Debrecen, Hungary.
Balázs András LukácsWetland Ecology Research Group, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gábor MatusDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Andrea McIntosh-BudayDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila MesterházyWetland Ecology Research Group, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Debrecen, Hungary.
Tamás MigléczÖMKi - Hungarian Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila Molnár VDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Tamás MorschhauserDoctoral School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
László PappBotanical Garden, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Patrícia PósaBalaton-felvidéki National Park Directorate, Csopak, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-1313
Tamás RédeiInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Dávid SchmidtInstitute of Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Ferenc SzmoradDepartment of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila TakácsDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Júlia TamásDepartment of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary.
Viktor TiborczSaint Orsolya Catholic Secondary and Elementary School, Sopron, Hungary.
Csaba TölgyesiHUN-REN-UD Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.
Katalin TóthDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Béla TóthmérészDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Orsolya ValkóLendület Seed Ecology Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-6293
Viktor VirókAggtelek National Park Directorate, Jósvafő, Hungary.
Tamás WirthBotanical Garden, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter TörökDepartment of Ecology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. molinia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-3327

Funding

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) BO/00587/23/8Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) K 119225Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) K 137573Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) KH 130320Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) KKP 144068Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) PD 137747Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) PD 137828Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) PD 138715Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI Office) PD 138859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing plant trait databases' applicability is limited for studies dealing with the flora and vegetation of the eastern and central part of Europe and for large-scale comparisons across regions, mostly because their geographical data coverage is limited and they incorporate records from several different sources, often from regions with markedly different climatic conditions. These problems motivated the compilation of a regional dataset for the flora of the Pannonian region (Eastern Central Europe). PADAPT, the Pannonian Dataset of Plant Traits relies on regional data sources and collates data on 54 traits and attributes of the plant species of the Pannonian region. The current version covers approximately 90% of the species of the region and consists of 126,337 records on 2745 taxa. By including species of the eastern part of Europe not covered by other databases, PADAPT can facilitate studying the flora and vegetation of the eastern part of the continent. Although data coverage is far from complete, PADAPT meets the longstanding need for a regional database of the Pannonian flora.

Indexed as

PlantsDatabases, FactualEuropeGeography

Identifiers

PMID37880224
PMCPMC10600112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.