Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Pair barracuda swarm optimization algorithm: a natural-inspired metaheuristic method for high dimensional optimization problems.

Jia Guo, Guoyuan Zhou, Ke Yan, Yuji Sato, Yi Di

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia GuoSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Guoyuan ZhouCollege of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Ke YanChina Construction Third Engineering Bureau Installation Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, 43074, China.
Yuji SatoFaculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Hosei University, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan.
Yi DiSchool of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China. diyi8710@hbue.edu.cn.

Funding

Education Department Scientific Research Program Project of Hubei Province of China Q20212204Education Department Scientific Research Program Project of Hubei Province of China Q20222208Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K12185Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2020CFB306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional optimization presents a novel challenge within the realm of intelligent computing, necessitating innovative approaches. When tackling high-dimensional spaces, traditional evolutionary tools often encounter pitfalls, including dimensional catastrophes and a propensity to become trapped in local optima, ultimately compromising result accuracy. To address this issue, we introduce the Pair Barracuda Swarm Optimization (PBSO) algorithm in this paper. PBSO employs a unique strategy for constructing barracuda pairs, effectively mitigating the challenges posed by high dimensionality. Furthermore, we enhance global search capabilities by incorporating a support barracuda alongside the leading barracuda pair. To assess the algorithm's performance, we conduct experiments utilizing the CEC2017 standard function and compare PBSO against five state-of-the-art natural-inspired optimizers in the control group. Across 29 test functions, PBSO consistently secures top rankings with 9 first-place, 13 second-place, 5 third-place, 1 fourth-place, and 1 fifth-place finishes, yielding an average rank of 2.0345. These empirical findings affirm that PBSO stands as the superior choice among all test algorithms, offering a dependable solution for high-dimensional optimization challenges.

Identifiers

PMID37880214
PMCPMC10600174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.