Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37880179›Full record

ArticleRMD open2023

Glucocorticoid trajectories over 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting.

Alycia Delteil, Celine Lambert, Bruno Pereira, Marion Couderc, Sandrine Malochet-Guinamand, Marie Eva Pickering, Marc Villedon, Sylvain Mathieu, Martin Soubrier, Anne Tournadre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alycia DelteilRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Celine LambertBiostatistic Units, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraBiostatistic Units, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marion CoudercRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-1132
Sandrine Malochet-GuinamandRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marie Eva PickeringRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marc VilledonRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sylvain MathieuRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-3227
Martin SoubrierRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-0720
Anne TournadreRheumatology, University Hospital Centre Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France atournadre@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5025-0214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyse glucocorticoid (GC) use and trajectories in a real-life cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsPatients with RA included in the longitudinal RCVRIC cohort for initiating or changing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, were compared for the use of GCs at baseline. Among the GC users, the GC dose was analysed over 2 years of follow-up by group-based trajectory models. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between the trajectories.

resultsAmong the 184 patients (RA duration 4.2 years (1.3; 12.6), Disease Activity Scores (DAS)28-C reactive protein (CRP) 4.24±2.14), 81 (44%) were on GCs. The GC users were significantly older, had higher CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), more hypertension and lower lumbar T-score, but similar activity and erosive scores. Among the GC users, two trajectories were identified: trajectory 1 (n=20, 25%) with GC discontinuation in the first year and trajectory 2 (n=61, 75%) with maintenance of low-dose GCs at 2 years. Trajectory 2 was significantly associated with higher HAQ, a longer GC duration and a less frequent methotrexate association. After adjustment for HAQ, GC duration and MTX use, good EULAR responses were less frequent at 6 months and 1 year in the GC maintenance trajectory (38.3% vs 81.3%, p=0.03; 42.0% vs 82.4%, p=0.02). Diabetes, fractures and increased body mass index were noted in trajectory 2.

conclusionGCs were used in almost half of patients with established RA in real-world practice. For the majority of GC users, a long-term low dose of GCs is maintained over 2 years. These results highlight the difficulties with stopping GCs, the lack of consensus for the efficacy-safety balance of GCs, and the need to individualise the best GC tapering.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidGlucocorticoidsHumansMethotrexateAntirheumatic AgentsGlucocorticoidsMethotrexateglucocorticoidsrheumatoid arthritistherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID37880179
PMCPMC10603352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.