ArticleRMD open2023
Glucocorticoid trajectories over 2 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-life setting.
Article in RMD open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of sarilumab vs JAK inhibitors in late- and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Flare risk after oral glucocorticoid bridging with methotrexate or intra-articular bridging with triple therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Observational
- Potential mechanisms of the glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome.European journal of endocrinology · 2026Review
- Single high-dose intramuscular injection versus short-term low-dose oral glucocorticoids as bridging therapy in active rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study on remission induction.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- The Role and Mechanistic Effects of Methotrexate in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.European journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- New guidelines on glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency: the end of short synacthen test in rheumatology?RMD open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyse glucocorticoid (GC) use and trajectories in a real-life cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
methodsPatients with RA included in the longitudinal RCVRIC cohort for initiating or changing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, were compared for the use of GCs at baseline. Among the GC users, the GC dose was analysed over 2 years of follow-up by group-based trajectory models. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between the trajectories.
resultsAmong the 184 patients (RA duration 4.2 years (1.3; 12.6), Disease Activity Scores (DAS)28-C reactive protein (CRP) 4.24±2.14), 81 (44%) were on GCs. The GC users were significantly older, had higher CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), more hypertension and lower lumbar T-score, but similar activity and erosive scores. Among the GC users, two trajectories were identified: trajectory 1 (n=20, 25%) with GC discontinuation in the first year and trajectory 2 (n=61, 75%) with maintenance of low-dose GCs at 2 years. Trajectory 2 was significantly associated with higher HAQ, a longer GC duration and a less frequent methotrexate association. After adjustment for HAQ, GC duration and MTX use, good EULAR responses were less frequent at 6 months and 1 year in the GC maintenance trajectory (38.3% vs 81.3%, p=0.03; 42.0% vs 82.4%, p=0.02). Diabetes, fractures and increased body mass index were noted in trajectory 2.
conclusionGCs were used in almost half of patients with established RA in real-world practice. For the majority of GC users, a long-term low dose of GCs is maintained over 2 years. These results highlight the difficulties with stopping GCs, the lack of consensus for the efficacy-safety balance of GCs, and the need to individualise the best GC tapering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.