ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2023
Quality of refractive error care in Pakistan: an unannounced standardised patient study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of no eyeglasses sales on the quality of eye care: an experimental evidence from China.BMC public health · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUndercorrected refractive errors are the primary cause of vision impairment worldwide, including in Pakistan. However, limited data exist on the quality of refractive error care. Our study assessed the quality of refractive error care in Punjab, Pakistan by estimating the proportion of spectacles that were optimally prescribed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this cross-sectional study, 12 unannounced standardised patients (USPs) from Jhang, Khanewal and Sahiwal districts were recruited. USPs underwent baseline subjective refraction and were trained to attend optical services, observe consultations, request spectacles and obtain prescriptions. The spectacles received were compared with baseline refraction to determine quality. We also examined the associations between spectacle quality, service and patient characteristics.
resultsOut of 276 attempted visits to 69 optical services, 241 pairs of spectacles were dispensed. A population size-weighted percentage of 42.7% (95% CI 36.4% to 49.3%) of spectacles were optimal quality, with the range varying from 13.8% in Jhang to 67.0% in Khanewal. Half the suboptimal quality spectacles had horizontal prism deviations outside of tolerance limits. Optimal spectacles were associated with performing focimetry (unadjusted OR=7.15, 95% CI (3.02 to 16.94), p<0.001) and good communication (OR=2.23, 95% CI (1.06 to 4.67), p=0.03). Hyperopic USPs were less likely to receive optimal spectacles (OR=0.01 95% CI (0.00 to 0.11), p<0.001).
conclusionThe quality of refractive error care in Pakistan requires improvement, particularly in the Jhang district. Key areas for enhancing refractive error care in Pakistan include refining dispensing and refraction skills for hyperopic prescriptions, providing training on the risks of using previous spectacles, and emphasising the importance of effective communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.