Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37879719›Full record

SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2023

Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhongbin Tao, Jie Wang, Yanming Li, Yongkang Zhou, Xiaoli Yan, Junqiang Yang, Huili Liu, Bowen Li, Jizu Ling, Yijie Pei and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Hip disorders in children and adolescents-an overview].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongbin TaoLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Jie WangLanzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yanming LiGansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China lym980426@163.com.ORCID 0009-0004-5427-790X
Yongkang ZhouLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Xiaoli YanLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Junqiang YangLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Huili LiuLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Bowen LiLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Jizu LingLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yijie PeiLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Jianglin ZhangLanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yuanyuan LiLanzhou University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
First Hospital of Lanzhou University · CNGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants with a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodA literature search was conducted in April 2023, using databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, CNKI, and SinoMed, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of DDH among infants aged 0-12 months. Two independent reviewers manually selected and coded the studies, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the prevalence of DDH. Regression analysis examined the trend of DDH prevalence, and stratification analysis explored heterogeneity between studies.

resultsA total of 65 studies involving 3 451 682 infants were included in the meta-analysis. None of the studies were classified as high quality, four were medium-to-high quality, 50 were low-to-medium quality, and eight were low quality. The pooled prevalence of DDH was 1.40% (95% CI: 0.86 to 2.28, I

conclusionThe prevalence of DDH among infants is approximately one in a 100, with girls being at higher risk. Though the prevalence of dysplasia has decreased, there is a slight upward trend in overall DDH. Therefore, routine screening for DDH in infants is recommended to prevent more serious developmental problems.

Indexed as

Developmental Dysplasia of the HipHip Dislocation, CongenitalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningPrevalenceInfantNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID37879719
PMCPMC10603435
OpenAlexW4387950506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.