Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37879676›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2023

Predictors of transitioning to adult mental health services and associated costs: a cross-country comparison.

Rebecca Appleton, Alastair Canaway, Helena Tuomainen, Gwen Dieleman, Suzanne Gerritsen, Mathilde Overbeek, Athanasios Maras, Larissa van Bodegom, Tomislav Franić, Giovanni de Girolamo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rebecca AppletonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, UCL, London, UK r.appleton@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-3512
Alastair CanawayWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-6808
Helena TuomainenWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1636-8187
Gwen DielemanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-5606
Suzanne GerritsenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-7501
Mathilde OverbeekYulius Academy, Yulius Mental Health Organization, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-8271
Athanasios MarasYulius Academy, Yulius Mental Health Organization, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9361-1414
Larissa van BodegomYulius Academy, Yulius Mental Health Organization, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-3020-0751
Tomislav FranićDepartment of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-7166
Giovanni de GirolamoUnit of Epidemiological Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-8324
Jason MadanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-1480
Fiona McNicholasDepartment of Academic Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University College Dublin, School of Medicine & Medical Science, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-6908
Diane Purper-OuakilService de Médecine Psychologique de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-1579
Ulrike M E SchulzeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-5140
Sabine TremmeryDepartment of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-5799-5965
Swaran P SinghWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-2089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people are at risk of falling through the care gap after leaving child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) despite an ongoing need for mental health support. Currently, little is known about the predictors of transitioning to adult mental health services (AMHS), and associated healthcare and societal costs as young people cross the transition boundary.

objectiveTo conduct a secondary data analysis exploring predictors of transitioning or falling through the gap and associated costs.

methodsData were used from a longitudinal study, which followed young people from seven European countries for 2 years after reaching their CAMHS boundary. Predictors of transitioning (including sociodemographic and clinical variables) and longitudinal resource use were compared for 488 young people who transitioned to AMHS versus those who fell through the gap.

findingsYoung people were more likely to transition to AMHS if they were severely ill. Those from Italy, the Netherlands and the UK were more likely to fall through the gap than transition to AMHS. Healthcare costs fell for all young people over the study, with a sharper decrease for those who fell through the gap.

conclusionsTotal healthcare costs fell for all participants, indicating that the intensity of mental health support reduces for all young people as they cross the CAMHS boundary, regardless of clinical need. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: It is important that alternative forms of mental health support are available for young people who do not meet the AMHS care threshold but still have mental health needs after leaving CAMHS.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultHumansLongitudinal Studieschild & adolescent psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID37879676
PMCPMC10603405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.